share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as CEVA, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CEVA) Recent 12% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as CEVA, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CEVA) Recent 12% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

作爲CEVA, Inc.,機構所有者可能會採取重大行動。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:CEVA)最近下跌12%,增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 23:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CEVA's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着CEVA的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前 7 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ:CEVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了CEVA, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CEVA),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲79%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 12% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 28% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell CEVA, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了12%。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了股東一年的28%的虧損,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構通常被稱爲 “市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售CEVA的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CEVA.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CEVA的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CEVA Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CEVA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CEVA?

關於CEVA,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CEVA. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CEVA, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在CEVA中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下CEVA過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CEVA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
納斯達克GS:CEVA收益和收入增長 2024年4月17日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.0% of CEVA. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 8.0% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有CEVA8.0%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的17%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約12%和8.0%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,大股東中有7人約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of CEVA

CEVA 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in CEVA, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$484m, and insiders have US$12m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有CEVA, Inc.的部分股份。它的市值僅爲4.84億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1200萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CEVA. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有10%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對CEVA有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論