share_log

After the Recent Decline, Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH) Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang's Holdings Have Lost 9.3% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH) Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang's Holdings Have Lost 9.3% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之後,諾亞控股有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NOAH)的高層管理人員王靜波的控股已經損失了9.3%的價值
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 22:38

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Noah Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • 37% of Noah Holdings is held by Institutions
  • 內部人士似乎對諾亞控股的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 諾亞控股37%的股份由機構持有

If you want to know who really controls Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 38% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着諾亞控股有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NOAH),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人內部人士,準確地說約爲38%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$81m.

結果,在市值下降8100萬美元之後,內部人士作爲一個整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Noah Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於諾亞控股的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NOAH Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:諾亞所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Noah Holdings?

關於諾亞控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Noah Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Noah Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有諾亞控股的相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到諾亞控股的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NOAH Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:NOAH 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 17 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 10% of Noah Holdings. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Noah Holdings' case, its Top Key Executive, Jingbo Wang, is the largest shareholder, holding 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that Zhe Yin, the CEO has 5.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有諾亞控股10%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。因爲行動勝於雄辯,所以我們認爲當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這是一個好兆頭。就諾亞控股而言,其最高主要高管王靜波是最大股東,持有21%的已發行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約10%和9.4%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官尹哲以其名義分配了5.2%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即該公司約有51%的股份由前五名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Noah Holdings

諾亞控股的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Noah Holdings Limited. Insiders have a US$316m stake in this US$842m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有諾亞控股有限公司的大量股份。業內人士在這筆8.42億美元的業務中持有3.16億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Noah Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

諾亞控股擁有16%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對諾亞控股有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Noah Holdings you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了諾亞控股的兩個警告信號,你應該注意了。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論