Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 4 hours 42 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,294.36
    +12.31 (+0.38%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,407.31
    +472.55 (+1.25%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,781.41
    +34.50 (+0.19%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,147.03
    +7.20 (+0.09%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    62,955.66
    -677.18 (-1.06%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,328.17
    -23.32 (-1.73%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,116.17
    +16.21 (+0.32%)
     
  • Dow

    38,386.09
    +146.43 (+0.38%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,983.08
    +55.18 (+0.35%)
     
  • Gold

    2,340.00
    -17.70 (-0.75%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.50
    -0.13 (-0.16%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6140
    -0.0550 (-1.18%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,581.72
    -0.94 (-0.06%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,248.90
    +93.12 (+1.30%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,767.43
    -2.21 (-0.03%)
     

Hanesbrands Inc.'s (NYSE:HBI) latest 8.4% decline adds to one-year losses, institutional investors may consider drastic measures

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Hanesbrands implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

A look at the shareholders of Hanesbrands Inc. (NYSE:HBI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.7b last week after a 8.4% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 2.7% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called “market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Hanesbrands' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hanesbrands.

See our latest analysis for Hanesbrands

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hanesbrands?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Hanesbrands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hanesbrands' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hanesbrands. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Cooke & Bieler, L.P. holds about 4.9% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Hanesbrands

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hanesbrands Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$8.7m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hanesbrands. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hanesbrands better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Hanesbrands , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.