share_log

Individual Investors Are EHang Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:EH) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$229m

Individual Investors Are EHang Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:EH) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$229m

個人投資者是億航控股有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:EH)的最大所有者,在市值下降2.29億美元后受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 00:25

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in EHang Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • 36% of EHang Holdings is held by insiders
  • 個人投資者對億恒控股的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 51% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • 億航控股36%的股份由內部人士持有

If you want to know who really controls EHang Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:EH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着億恒控股有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:EH),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲45%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While insiders who own 36% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$982m last week,individual investors took the most losses.

儘管上週市值跌至9.82億美元后,持有36%的內部人士承受了壓力,但個人投資者蒙受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of EHang Holdings.

在下圖中,我們放大了億恒控股的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:EH Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
NasdaqGM:EH 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EHang Holdings?

關於億恒控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that EHang Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see EHang Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,億航控股確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到eHang Holdings的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:EH Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:EH 2024年4月16日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EHang Holdings. The company's CEO Huazhi Hu is the largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對億恒控股進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官胡華智是最大股東,已發行股份的34%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.7%和3.3%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of EHang Holdings

億恒控股的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of EHang Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$982m, and insiders have US$352m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有億恒控股有限公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲9.82億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3.52億美元的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司45%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand EHang Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that EHang Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解億恒控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,億恒控股在我們的投資分析中顯示出兩個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論