share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After ZipRecruiter, Inc.'s (NYSE:ZIP) Latest 7.6% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After ZipRecruiter, Inc.'s (NYSE:ZIP) Latest 7.6% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

在ZipRecruiter, Inc.之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴厲措施。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZIP)最近7.6%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 22:48

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ZipRecruiter's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,ZipRecruiter的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有6位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲53%
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着ZipRecruiter, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZIP),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲45%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 7.6% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 39% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in ZipRecruiter's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

在上週該公司股價下跌7.6%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了股東一年的39%的虧損,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果ZipRecruiter的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ZipRecruiter.

在下圖中,我們放大了ZipRecruiter的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ZIP Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ZIP 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZipRecruiter?

關於ZipRecruiter,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ZipRecruiter. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ZipRecruiter's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在ZipRecruiter中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看ZipRecruiter的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ZIP Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ZIP 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 16 日

It looks like hedge funds own 7.7% of ZipRecruiter shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Siegel Family Trust is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 8.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

看來對沖基金擁有ZipRecruiter7.7%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。西格爾家族信託基金目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的12%和8.2%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了進一步的挖掘,發現6個最大的股東佔了大股東的53%左右,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,因此在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of ZipRecruiter

ZipRecruiter 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in ZipRecruiter, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$38m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有ZipRecruiter, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3800萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in ZipRecruiter. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有ZipRecruiter19%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the ZipRecruiter board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有12%的股份,可能會影響ZipRecruiter董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司14%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ZipRecruiter better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with ZipRecruiter .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解ZipRecruiter,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在ZipRecruiter上發現的兩個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論