Trump's Request To Attend Supreme Court Hearing, Barron's High School Graduation Denied By Hush Money Trial Judge
Trump's Request To Attend Supreme Court Hearing, Barron's High School Graduation Denied By Hush Money Trial Judge
In a recent development, former President Donald Trump's request to attend the Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity has been rejected. This comes amidst his ongoing hush money trial in New York.
在最近的事態發展中，前總統唐納德·特朗普要求出席最高法院關於總統豁免的辯論的請求被駁回。這是他正在紐約進行的 “祕密金錢審判” 之際發生的。
What Happened: The New York judge overseeing Trump's trial has ruled that the former president cannot attend the Supreme Court's oral arguments scheduled for April 25. This comes after Trump's previous request to attend his son Barron's high school graduation in May, which is still under consideration by the judge, reported The Hill.
發生了什麼：監督特朗普審判的紐約法官裁定，前總統不能出席定於4月25日舉行的最高法院口頭辯論。希爾報道，這是在特朗普此前要求參加兒子巴倫5月的高中畢業典禮之後發生的，該請求仍在法官的考慮中。
The trial, taking place in Manhattan, is expected to last for several weeks or even months. New York state law mandates Trump's presence throughout the trial unless the judge grants special permission.
該審判在曼哈頓進行，預計將持續數週甚至數月。紐約州法律規定，除非法官給予特別許可，否則特朗普在整個審判期間都必須在場。
The Supreme Court hearing is related to a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case. Trump, who faces 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a hush money payment, has pleaded not guilty and denies the affair.
最高法院的聽證會與特朗普在聯邦刑事案件中提出的總統豁免要求有關。特朗普面臨34項僞造與隱秘付款有關的商業記錄的罪名，他不認罪並否認此事。
After the day's proceedings, Trump criticized Judge Juan Merchan, implying that the judge considers himself "superior" to the Supreme Court. He also accused Merchan of blocking him from attending his son's graduation.
當天的訴訟結束後，特朗普批評了胡安·默尚法官，暗示該法官認爲自己比最高法院 “優越”。他還指責默尚阻止他參加兒子的畢業典禮。
Jury selection for the trial is set to resume on Tuesday and could extend over several days or weeks.
審判的陪審團甄選定於週二恢復，可能持續數天或數週。
Why It Matters: The trial revolves around alleged hush money payments made ahead of the 2016 election. The outcome of the trial could have significant implications for Trump's potential 2024 campaign.
爲何重要：該審判圍繞據稱在2016年大選前支付的隱秘款項展開。審判結果可能會對特朗普可能的2024年競選活動產生重大影響。
On the first day of the trial, Trump argued 'Political Prosecution' before the jury selection, as reported by Benzinga.
據本辛加報道，在審判的第一天，特朗普在陪審團甄選之前辯稱 “政治起訴”。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。