share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore The GEO Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:GEO) Recent US$71m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore The GEO Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:GEO) Recent US$71m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構所有者可能會忽略GEO集團有限公司。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:GEO)由於長期利潤保持增長,最近市值下降了7100萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  04/15 19:47

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies GEO Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構所有權過高意味着GEO Group的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近的購買

To get a sense of who is truly in control of The GEO Group, Inc. (NYSE:GEO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 77% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了GEO Group, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:GEO),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有77%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.5% last week. However, the 90% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降3.5%的機構投資者了。但是,90%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of GEO Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究GEO Group的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GEO Ownership Breakdown April 15th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GEO 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GEO Group?

關於GEO集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GEO Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at GEO Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在GEO Group中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看GEO集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GEO Earnings and Revenue Growth April 15th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GEO 2024年4月15日收益和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GEO Group. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對GEO集團進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲15%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和4.2%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of GEO Group

GEO 集團的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in The GEO Group, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$74m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有GEO Group, Inc.的部分股份。內部人士持有價值7400萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in GEO Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有GEO集團19%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with GEO Group (including 1 which is significant) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在GEO Group中發現的3個警告信號(包括一個重要的警告信號)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論