share_log

Golden Matrix Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GMGI) Market Cap Dropped US$197m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

Golden Matrix Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GMGI) Market Cap Dropped US$197m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

金矩陣集團有限公司s(納斯達克股票代碼:GMGI)上週市值下降了1.97億美元;個人投資者首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  04/14 22:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Golden Matrix Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 個人投資者對金矩陣集團的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有3位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

A look at the shareholders of Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:GMGI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 14% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看金矩陣集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GMGI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人投資者持有 14% 的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Following last week's price drop, Individual investors saw a decline in their holdings value after market cap dropped by US$197m last week. Meanwhile, the low insider ownership hasn't gone unnoticed. Usually, companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

繼上週價格下跌之後,上週市值下降1.97億美元后,個人投資者的持股價值有所下降。同時,低內部所有權並沒有被忽視。通常,已經私有化的公司的內部所有權往往較低。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Golden Matrix Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了金矩陣集團的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:GMGI Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2024
納斯達克公司:GMGI 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Golden Matrix Group?

關於金矩陣集團,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們往往不會看到機構投資者持有風險很大、交易量稀少或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到大公司沒有註冊機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Golden Matrix Group, for yourself, below.

機構爲何不擁有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,與所管理的資金相比,公司規模太小,因此該機構不願仔細研究該公司。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面親眼看到金矩陣集團過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:GMGI Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GMGI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 14 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.3% of Golden Matrix Group. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. With a 23% stake, CEO Anthony Goodman is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 20% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Weiting Feng is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有金矩陣集團6.3%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。首席執行官安東尼·古德曼持有23%的股份,是最大股東。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約20%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.6%的所有權。有趣的是,第三大股東馮偉廷也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其51%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Golden Matrix Group

金矩陣集團的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Golden Matrix Group, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$30m worth of stock in the US$304m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有金矩陣集團的部分股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值3.04億美元的公司價值3000萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Golden Matrix Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有14%所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對金矩陣集團有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Golden Matrix Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Golden Matrix Group has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解金矩陣集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-金矩陣集團有 3 個警告標誌(其中 2 個有點不愉快),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論