share_log

Oatly Group AB's (NASDAQ:OTLY) Market Cap Dropped US$51m Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

Oatly Group AB's (NASDAQ:OTLY) Market Cap Dropped US$51m Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

Oatly Group AB(納斯達克股票代碼:OTLY)的市值上週下降了5100萬美元;私營公司首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  04/14 21:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Oatly Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 2 shareholders own 59% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 私營公司在Oatly集團擁有大量所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權。
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司 59% 的股份
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Oatly Group AB (NASDAQ:OTLY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Oatly Group AB(納斯達克股票代碼:OTLY),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有46%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$51m.

結果,在市值下降5100萬美元之後,私營公司整體上週遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Oatly Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了Oatly集團的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OTLY Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2024
納斯達克GS:OTLY 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Oatly Group?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Oatly集團的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Oatly Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Oatly Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Oatly集團已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Oatly集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OTLY Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2024
納斯達克GS:OTLY 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 14 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Oatly Group. Our data shows that China Resources Verlinvest Health Investment Limited is the largest shareholder with 46% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Toni Petersson, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Co-Chairman of the Board.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Oatly集團進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,華潤Verlinvest健康投資有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的46%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約13%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有1.5%的所有權。第三大股東託尼·彼得森也恰好擁有董事會聯席主席的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Oatly Group

Oatly Group 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Oatly Group AB. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$10m worth of the US$598m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Oatly Group AB的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值5.98億美元的公司價值1000萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司33%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 13% stake in Oatly Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有Oatly集團13%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 46%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司46%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司的股權而對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份獲得權益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個有待進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Oatly Group that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了Oatly集團的1個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論