share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Celcuity Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CELC) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Celcuity Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CELC) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽視 Celcuity Inc.”s(納斯達克股票代碼:CELC)由於長期收益保持樂觀,最近市值下降了5100萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  04/13 21:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Celcuity's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • 14% of Celcuity is held by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Celcuity的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • Celcuity 14% 的股份由內部人士持有

Every investor in Celcuity Inc. (NASDAQ:CELC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 30% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Celcuity Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CELC)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲30%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 8.3% last week. Still, the 88% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降8.3%的機構投資者了。儘管如此,88%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Celcuity, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Celcuity的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:CELC Ownership Breakdown April 13th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CELC 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celcuity?

關於Celcuity,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Celcuity already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Celcuity, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Celcuity已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Celcuity過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:CELC Earnings and Revenue Growth April 13th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CELC 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 13 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 13% of Celcuity. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Brian Sullivan with 9.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.7% and 8.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有Celcuity13%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官布萊恩·沙利文,其已發行股份佔9.9%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.7%和8.6%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Celcuity

Celcuity 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Celcuity Inc.. Insiders have a US$87m stake in this US$600m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Celcuity Inc.合理比例的股份。業內人士在這筆6億美元的業務中持有8700萬美元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Celcuity. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Celcuity16%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 26%, private equity firms could influence the Celcuity board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有26%的股份,可能會影響Celcuity董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Celcuity (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了Celcuity的3個警告信號(其中一個讓我們有點不舒服),你應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論