share_log

Individual Investors Own 25% of City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) Shares but Private Companies Control 59% of the Company

Individual Investors Own 25% of City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) Shares but Private Companies Control 59% of the Company

個人投資者擁有城市發展有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:C09)25%的股份,但私營公司控制了該公司59%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  04/13 06:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over City Developments by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 54% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd.)
  • Institutional ownership in City Developments is 16%
  • 私營公司對城市發展的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 該公司54%的股份由單一股東持有(豐隆投資控股私人有限公司)有限公司)
  • 城市開發的機構所有權爲16%

A look at the shareholders of City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看城市發展有限公司(SGX: C09)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 25% of the company's stockholders.

另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的25%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about City Developments.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於城市發展的信息。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:C09 Ownership Breakdown April 12th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:C09 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Developments?

關於城市發展,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

City Developments already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at City Developments' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

城市發展公司已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看城市發展的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:C09 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 12th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:C09 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 12 日

City Developments is not owned by hedge funds. Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 54% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.1% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 2.2% of the company stock.

城市發展不歸對沖基金所有。豐隆投資控股有限公司Ltd. 目前是最大股東,已發行股份的54%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有5.1%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約2.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of City Developments

城市開發項目的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of City Developments Limited in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$2.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有城市發展有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值230萬新元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司25%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 59%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的59%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand City Developments better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for City Developments (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解城市發展,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了 3 個城市發展警告標誌(其中 1 個很重要!)你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論