share_log

Institutional Investors in Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

洛伊斯公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:L)的機構投資者上週下跌了3.3%,但已經從長期增長中受益
Simply Wall St ·  04/12 20:12

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Loews' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Loews的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

Every investor in Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

洛斯公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:L)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲59%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.3% in value last week. However, the 31% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降3.3%的機構投資者。但是,31%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Loews.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Loews 的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:L Ownership Breakdown April 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Loews?

關於洛伊斯,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Loews does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Loews' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,洛斯確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Loews的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:L Earnings and Revenue Growth April 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:L 2024年4月12日的收益和收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Loews. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.9% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. James Tisch, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對洛伊斯進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的9.3%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.9%和6.7%。第三大股東詹姆斯·蒂施也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Loews

Loews 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Loews Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$17b, and insiders have US$3.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

內部人士似乎擁有洛伊斯公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲170億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值30億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Loews. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Loews擁有23%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對洛斯有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Loews better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Loews , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解洛伊斯,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Loews確定了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論