share_log

AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAON) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 72% of the Company

AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAON) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 72% of the Company

AAON, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AAON)受到持有公司72%股份的機構所有者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 23:12

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies AAON's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着AAON的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前6名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

Every investor in AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAON) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 72% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

AAON, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AAON)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲72%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AAON, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究AAON的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:AAON Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
NASDAQGS: AAON 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AAON?

關於AAON,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AAON. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AAON's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在AAON中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看AAON的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:AAON Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
NASDAQGS: AAON 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 11 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. AAON is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Norman Asbjornson, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 17%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。AAON 不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,同時也是該公司最高主要高管的諾曼·阿斯比約恩森持有的股票數量最多,爲17%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定在公司的未來中。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約13%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.8%的所有權。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of AAON

AAON 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in AAON, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.3b stake in this US$7.3b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有AAON, Inc.的大量股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項73億美元的業務中擁有13億美元的大量股份。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AAON. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

AAON擁有10%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對AAON有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for AAON that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了AAON的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論