share_log

With 58% Ownership in Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 58% Ownership in Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有奧斯卡健康公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:OSCR)58%的所有權,機構投資者在很大程度上依賴該業務
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 21:12

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Oscar Health's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構所有權過高意味着Oscar Health的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 58% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了奧斯卡健康公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:OSCR),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有58%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 6.6% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 137%.

結果,在上週公司股價上漲6.6%之後,機構投資者獲得了最大的回報。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲137%的股東一年回報率。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Oscar Health, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究奧斯卡健康的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:OSCR Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:OSCR 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Oscar Health?

關於奧斯卡健康,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Oscar Health does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Oscar Health's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Oscar Health確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Oscar Health的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:OSCR Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:OSCR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 11 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Oscar Health. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Thrive Capital Management, LLC with 16% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.3%.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在奧斯卡健康的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Thrive Capital Management, LLC,其已發行股份爲16%。第二和第三大股東是貝萊德公司和Vanguard Group, Inc.,其股數與其同等份額,爲6.3%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現10位大股東約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Oscar Health

奧斯卡健康的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Oscar Health, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$95m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有奧斯卡健康公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約9500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Oscar Health. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有奧斯卡健康17%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 22%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有22%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Oscar Health better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Oscar Health .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解奧斯卡健康,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Oscar Health身上發現的3個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論