share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Couchbase, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BASE) Recent US$54m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Couchbase, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BASE) Recent US$54m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構所有者可能會忽略Couchbase, Inc.”s(納斯達克股票代碼:BASE)由於長期利潤保持增長,最近市值下降了5400萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 20:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Couchbase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Couchbase的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲53%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Couchbase, Inc. (NASDAQ:BASE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Couchbase, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:BASE),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲63%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.3b last week. Still, the 70% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司的市值跌至13億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。儘管如此,70%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Couchbase.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Couchbase的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BASE Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
NASDAQGS:基礎所有權明細 2024年4月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Couchbase?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Couchbase的哪些信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Couchbase already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Couchbase, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Couchbase已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Couchbase過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BASE Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年4月11日的基本收益和收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 5.1% of Couchbase shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 6.2% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。看來對沖基金擁有Couchbase5.1%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份爲7.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約6.3%和6.2%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多挖掘,發現10名最大股東約佔註冊人數的53%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Couchbase

Couchbase 的內部人士所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Couchbase, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Couchbase, Inc.不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1100萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Couchbase. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有13%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Couchbase有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Couchbase. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有Couchbase18%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Couchbase better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Couchbase , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Couchbase,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Couchbase確定了兩個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論