share_log

Both Individual Investors Who Control a Good Portion of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE:ZIM) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.9% Decrease

Both Individual Investors Who Control a Good Portion of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE:ZIM) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.9% Decrease

在上週下跌6.9%之後,控制ZIM綜合航運服務有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZIM)很大一部分股份的個人投資者和機構都必須感到沮喪
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 18:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 39% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 22%
  • 個人投資者對ZIM綜合航運服務擁有大量所有權,這表明他們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 39% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • ZIM 綜合航運服務的機構所有權爲 22%

Every investor in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE:ZIM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

ZIM綜合航運服務有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZIM)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲56%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Following a 6.9% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 22% stock also took a hit.

繼上週股價下跌6.9%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大,但擁有22%股票的機構也受到打擊。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究ZIM綜合運輸服務的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ZIM Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ZIM 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZIM Integrated Shipping Services?

關於ZIM綜合運輸服務,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

ZIM綜合航運服務已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下ZIM綜合航運服務過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ZIM Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ZIM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 11 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Court Investments Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 2.2%. Furthermore, CEO Eliyahu Glickman is the owner of 1.1% of the company's shares.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對ZIM綜合航運服務進行有意義的投資。法院投資有限公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的21%。第二和第三大股東是Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd.和貝萊德公司,其持股量與其同等數量的股份,爲2.2%。此外,首席執行官埃利亞胡·格里克曼是該公司1.1%股份的所有者。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services

ZIM 綜合航運服務的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$13m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有ZIM綜合航運服務有限公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1300萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 56% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有ZIM綜合航運服務56%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的21%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論