share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK) With 43% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK) With 43% Ownership

機構投資者對擁有43%所有權的Talkspace, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:TALK)大加讚賞
Simply Wall St ·  04/10 19:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Talkspace's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着Talkspace的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有12名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Talkspace, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:TALK),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有43%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Last week's 9.2% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 429% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週9.2%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年期股東回報率爲429%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Talkspace, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Talkspace的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:TALK Ownership Breakdown April 10th 2024
NASDAQCM:2024年4月10日討論所有權明細

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Talkspace?

關於Talkspace,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Talkspace does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Talkspace, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Talkspace確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Talkspace過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:TALK Earnings and Revenue Growth April 10th 2024
NasdaqCM:2024年4月10日Talk收益和收入增長

It looks like hedge funds own 6.7% of Talkspace shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is NVP Associates, LLC with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Jon Cohen, the CEO has 1.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

看來對沖基金擁有Talkspace6.7%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是NVP Associates, LLC,其已發行股份佔8.7%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.1%的所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官喬恩·科恩以其名義分配了1.4%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數字就會發現,前12名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Talkspace

Talkspace 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Talkspace, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$32m worth of the US$630m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Talkspace, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值6.3億美元的公司價值3200萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Talkspace. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Talkspace32%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Talkspace. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Talkspace14%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Talkspace better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Talkspace that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Talkspace,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了Talkspace的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論