share_log

We Think Wave Life Sciences (NASDAQ:WVE) Can Easily Afford To Drive Business Growth

We Think Wave Life Sciences (NASDAQ:WVE) Can Easily Afford To Drive Business Growth

我們認爲Wave Life Sciences(納斯達克股票代碼:WVE)可以輕鬆負擔得起推動業務增長的費用
Simply Wall St ·  04/09 18:50

Even when a business is losing money, it's possible for shareholders to make money if they buy a good business at the right price. For example, although Amazon.com made losses for many years after listing, if you had bought and held the shares since 1999, you would have made a fortune. But while the successes are well known, investors should not ignore the very many unprofitable companies that simply burn through all their cash and collapse.

即使企業虧損,如果股東以合適的價格收購一家好的企業,他們也有可能賺錢。例如,儘管Amazon.com在上市後多年虧損,但如果您自1999年以來一直買入並持有股票,您本來可以發大財。但是,儘管成功是衆所周知的,但投資者不應忽視許多無利可圖的公司,這些公司乾脆耗盡了所有現金然後倒閉。

So, the natural question for Wave Life Sciences (NASDAQ:WVE) shareholders is whether they should be concerned by its rate of cash burn. For the purpose of this article, we'll define cash burn as the amount of cash the company is spending each year to fund its growth (also called its negative free cash flow). The first step is to compare its cash burn with its cash reserves, to give us its 'cash runway'.

因此,對於Wave Life Sciences(納斯達克股票代碼:WVE)股東來說,自然而然的問題是他們是否應該擔心其現金消耗率。就本文而言,我們將現金消耗定義爲公司每年爲其增長提供資金的現金金額(也稱爲負自由現金流)。第一步是將其現金消耗與現金儲備進行比較,爲我們提供 “現金流”。

Does Wave Life Sciences Have A Long Cash Runway?

Wave Life Sciences 的現金流是否很長?

A company's cash runway is calculated by dividing its cash hoard by its cash burn. As at December 2023, Wave Life Sciences had cash of US$200m and no debt. Looking at the last year, the company burnt through US$21m. That means it had a cash runway of about 9.8 years as of December 2023. While this is only one measure of its cash burn situation, it certainly gives us the impression that holders have nothing to worry about. Depicted below, you can see how its cash holdings have changed over time.

公司的現金流是通過其現金儲備除以現金消耗來計算的。截至2023年12月,Wave Life Sciences的現金爲2億美元,沒有債務。縱觀去年,該公司耗資2100萬美元。這意味着截至2023年12月,它的現金流約爲9.8年。儘管這只是衡量其現金消耗情況的一個指標,但它無疑給我們的印象是持有人不必擔心。如下所示,您可以看到其現金持有量隨着時間的推移而發生了怎樣的變化。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGM:WVE Debt to Equity History April 9th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:WVE 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 4 月 9 日

How Well Is Wave Life Sciences Growing?

Wave 生命科學的發展情況如何?

Happily, Wave Life Sciences is travelling in the right direction when it comes to its cash burn, which is down 84% over the last year. But its revenue is better yet, flying higher than Elon Musk and his rocket, with growth of 3,005% in the last year. Considering these factors, we're fairly impressed by its growth trajectory. Clearly, however, the crucial factor is whether the company will grow its business going forward. For that reason, it makes a lot of sense to take a look at our analyst forecasts for the company.

令人高興的是,Wave Life Sciences在現金消耗方面正朝着正確的方向前進,現金消耗比去年下降了84%。但是它的收入還要好,比埃隆·馬斯克和他的火箭還要高,去年增長了3,005%。考慮到這些因素,其增長軌跡給我們留下了深刻的印象。但是,顯然,關鍵因素是該公司未來是否會發展其業務。出於這個原因,看一下我們的分析師對公司的預測很有意義。

How Easily Can Wave Life Sciences Raise Cash?

Wave Life Sciences 如何輕鬆籌集資金?

There's no doubt Wave Life Sciences seems to be in a fairly good position, when it comes to managing its cash burn, but even if it's only hypothetical, it's always worth asking how easily it could raise more money to fund growth. Issuing new shares, or taking on debt, are the most common ways for a listed company to raise more money for its business. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. By comparing a company's annual cash burn to its total market capitalisation, we can estimate roughly how many shares it would have to issue in order to run the company for another year (at the same burn rate).

毫無疑問,在管理現金消耗方面,Wave Life Sciences似乎處於相當有利的地位,但即使這只是假設,也總是值得一問的是,它籌集更多資金爲增長提供資金有多容易。發行新股或承擔債務是上市公司爲其業務籌集更多資金的最常見方式。通常,企業會自行出售新股以籌集現金和推動增長。通過將公司的年度現金消耗與其總市值進行比較,我們可以大致估計該公司必須發行多少股才能再經營一年(以相同的消耗率)。

Wave Life Sciences' cash burn of US$21m is about 2.8% of its US$723m market capitalisation. That means it could easily issue a few shares to fund more growth, and might well be in a position to borrow cheaply.

Wave Life Sciences的2100萬美元現金消耗約爲其7.23億美元市值的2.8%。這意味着它可以輕鬆發行幾股股票來爲更多的增長提供資金,並且很可能有能力廉價地借款。

So, Should We Worry About Wave Life Sciences' Cash Burn?

那麼,我們應該擔心Wave Life Sciences的現金消耗嗎?

As you can probably tell by now, we're not too worried about Wave Life Sciences' cash burn. In particular, we think its revenue growth stands out as evidence that the company is well on top of its spending. And even its cash burn relative to its market cap was very encouraging. After considering a range of factors in this article, we're pretty relaxed about its cash burn, since the company seems to be in a good position to continue to fund its growth. Readers need to have a sound understanding of business risks before investing in a stock, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Wave Life Sciences that potential shareholders should take into account before putting money into a stock.

正如你現在可能知道的那樣,我們並不太擔心Wave Life Sciences的現金消耗。特別是,我們認爲其收入增長突出,證明該公司的支出處於領先地位。而且,即使是相對於市值的現金消耗也非常令人鼓舞。在考慮了本文中的一系列因素之後,我們對其現金消耗感到非常放鬆,因爲該公司似乎處於繼續爲其增長提供資金的有利地位。讀者在投資股票之前需要對商業風險有充分的了解,我們已經發現了Wave Life Sciences的3個警告信號,潛在股東在向股票投入資金之前應考慮這些信號。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies insiders are buying, and this list of stocks growth stocks (according to analyst forecasts)

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份內部人士正在買入的公司的免費清單,以及這份成長型股票清單(根據分析師的預測)

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論