share_log

Hanesbrands (NYSE:HBI) Will Be Hoping To Turn Its Returns On Capital Around

Hanesbrands (NYSE:HBI) Will Be Hoping To Turn Its Returns On Capital Around

Hanesbrands(紐約證券交易所代碼:HBI)希望扭轉其資本回報率
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 19:28

When it comes to investing, there are some useful financial metrics that can warn us when a business is potentially in trouble. Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. This combination can tell you that not only is the company investing less, it's earning less on what it does invest. So after glancing at the trends within Hanesbrands (NYSE:HBI), we weren't too hopeful.

在投資方面,有一些有用的財務指標可以在企業可能遇到麻煩時向我們發出警告。衰落的企業通常有兩個潛在趨勢,首先是衰退 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE)和下降情況 基礎 所用資本的比例。這種組合可以告訴你,公司不僅減少了投資,而且投資的收益也減少了。因此,在看了一眼Hanesbrands(紐約證券交易所代碼:HBI)內部的趨勢之後,我們並不抱太大希望。

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

了解資本使用回報率 (ROCE)

Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. The formula for this calculation on Hanesbrands is:

爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。在 Hanesbrands 上進行此計算的公式爲:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.085 = US$363m ÷ (US$5.6b - US$1.4b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).

0.085 = 3.63億美元 ÷(56億美元-14億美元) (基於截至2023年12月的過去十二個月)

So, Hanesbrands has an ROCE of 8.5%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Luxury industry average of 12%.

因此,Hanesbrands的投資回報率爲8.5%。歸根結底,這是一個低迴報,其表現低於奢侈品行業12%的平均水平。

roce
NYSE:HBI Return on Capital Employed April 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HBI 2024年4月8日動用資本回報率

In the above chart we have measured Hanesbrands' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Hanesbrands for free.

在上圖中,我們將Hanesbrands之前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了比較,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你願意,你可以免費查看分析師對Hanesbrands的預測。

How Are Returns Trending?

退貨趨勢如何?

In terms of Hanesbrands' historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. About five years ago, returns on capital were 18%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Hanesbrands becoming one if things continue as they have.

就Hanesbrands的歷史ROCE運動而言,這種趨勢並不能激發信心。大約五年前,資本回報率爲18%,但現在已大大低於我們在上面看到的水平。在資本使用方面,該企業使用的資本量與當時大致相同。表現出這些屬性的公司往往不會萎縮,但它們可能已經成熟,面臨競爭對利潤的壓力。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造一個多口袋品牌,因此,如果一切照原樣,我們就不會屏住呼吸希望Hanesbrands成爲一個整體。

The Bottom Line On Hanesbrands' ROCE

Hanesbrands 投資回報率的底線

All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 67% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.

總而言之,使用相同數量的資本所產生的較低迴報並不完全是複利機器的跡象。在過去五年中持有該股的長期股東的投資貶值了67%,因此看來市場可能也不喜歡這些趨勢。既然如此,除非潛在趨勢恢復到更積極的軌跡,否則我們會考慮將目光投向其他地方。

If you'd like to know about the risks facing Hanesbrands, we've discovered 1 warning sign that you should be aware of.

如果你想了解Hanesbrands面臨的風險,我們發現了一個你應該注意的警告信號。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

對於那些喜歡投資穩健公司的人,可以查看這份資產負債表穩健和股本回報率高的公司的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論