Here's Why Dave & Buster's Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Here's Why Dave & Buster's Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLAY) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
由伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李露對此毫不掩飾,他說:“最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們可以看到,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司(納斯達克股票代碼:PLAY)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時危險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務爲企業提供幫助,直到企業難以用新資本或自由現金流還清債務。資本主義的重要組成部分是 “創造性破壞” 的過程,在這個過程中,銀行家無情地清算倒閉的企業。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是它必須以低價籌集新的股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們研究債務水平時,我們首先將現金和債務水平放在一起考慮。
What Is Dave & Buster's Entertainment's Net Debt?
戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of February 2024 Dave & Buster's Entertainment had US$1.29b of debt, an increase on US$1.23b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$37.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.26b.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年2月,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司在一年內有12.9億美元的債務,比12.3億美元有所增加。但是,由於其現金儲備爲3730萬美元,其淨負債較少,約爲12.6億美元。
A Look At Dave & Buster's Entertainment's Liabilities
看看 Dave & Buster 娛樂公司的負債
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Dave & Buster's Entertainment had liabilities of US$435.6m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.07b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$37.3m as well as receivables valued at US$44.8m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$3.42b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,Dave & Buster's Entertainment的負債爲4.356億美元,一年後到期的負債爲30.7億美元。除這些債務外,它有3730萬美元的現金以及價值4,480萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出34.2億美元。
When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$2.60b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.
當你考慮到這一缺口超過了公司26.0億美元的市值時,你很可能會傾向於仔細審查資產負債表。假設,如果公司被迫通過按當前股價籌集資金來償還負債,則需要進行極其嚴重的稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
While Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a quite reasonable net debt to EBITDA multiple of 2.4, its interest cover seems weak, at 2.5. This does suggest the company is paying fairly high interest rates. Either way there's no doubt the stock is using meaningful leverage. Dave & Buster's Entertainment grew its EBIT by 9.8% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Dave & Buster's Entertainment's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
儘管Dave & Buster's Entertainment的淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的倍數相當合理,爲2.4,但其利息覆蓋面似乎薄弱,爲2.5。這確實表明該公司支付了相當高的利率。無論哪種方式,毫無疑問,該股正在使用有意義的槓桿作用。去年,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的息稅前利潤增長了9.8%。這遠非不可思議,但在還清債務方面,這是一件好事。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,未來的收益將決定戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Dave & Buster's Entertainment produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 54% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們顯然需要研究息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Dave & Buster's Entertainment產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其息稅前利潤的54%,與我們的預期差不多。這種自由現金流使公司處於有利地位,可以在適當的時候償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Dave & Buster's Entertainment's interest cover and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its EBIT growth rate is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that Dave & Buster's Entertainment's debt is making it a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Dave & Buster's Entertainment (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
坦率地說,Dave & Buster's Entertainment的利息保障及其保持總負債水平的往績都使我們對其債務水平感到相當不舒服。但好的一面是,其息稅前利潤增長率是一個好兆頭,也使我們更加樂觀。一旦我們綜合考慮了上述所有因素,在我們看來,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的債務使其有點風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們注意到了潛在的陷阱,因此我們可能更願意減少債務。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們發現了 Dave & Buster's Entertainment 的 2 個警告標誌(1 個不容忽視!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。