share_log

After the Recent Decline, Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLSE) Top Key Executive Robert Duggan's Holdings Have Lost 13% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLSE) Top Key Executive Robert Duggan's Holdings Have Lost 13% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之後,Pulse Biosciences, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:PLSE)高管羅伯特·杜根的持股已經損失了13%的價值
Simply Wall St ·  04/05 19:19

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Pulse Biosciences' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 68% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Robert Duggan)
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 內部人士似乎對Pulse Biosciences的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 公司68%的股份由單一股東持有(羅伯特·杜根)
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLSE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Pulse Biosciences, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:PLSE),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有70%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌13%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pulse Biosciences, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Pulse Biosciences的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:PLSE Ownership Breakdown April 5th 2024
納斯達克公司:PLSE 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pulse Biosciences?

關於Pulse Biosciences,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pulse Biosciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pulse Biosciences' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在Pulse Biosciences中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Pulse Biosciences的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:PLSE Earnings and Revenue Growth April 5th 2024
納斯達克公司:PLSE 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 5 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pulse Biosciences. Our data suggests that Robert Duggan, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 68%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.9% of common stock, and Bank of America Corporation, Asset Management Arm holds about 1.5% of the company stock.

對沖基金在Pulse Biosciences的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,同時也是該公司最高主要高管的羅伯特·杜根持有的股票數量最多,爲68%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定在公司的未來中。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有1.9%的普通股,美國銀行資產管理部門持有該公司約1.5%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Pulse Biosciences

脈衝生物科學的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Pulse Biosciences, Inc.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$293m stake in this US$420m business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有Pulse Biosciences, Inc.一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。因此,他們在這筆4.2億美元的業務中擁有2.93億美元的股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pulse Biosciences. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Pulse Biosciences擁有21%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Pulse Biosciences有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Pulse Biosciences has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are significant) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——Pulse Biosciences有4個警告信號(其中2個是重大警示信號),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論