share_log

FibroGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FGEN) Latest 43% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

FibroGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FGEN) Latest 43% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

FibroGen, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:FGEN)最近43%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損,機構投資者可能會考慮採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  04/04 21:56

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in FibroGen implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構對FibroGen的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有8名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

If you want to know who really controls FibroGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:FGEN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 62% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着FibroGen, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:FGEN),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲62%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$145m last week after a 43% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 92% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell FibroGen which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌43%後跌至1.45億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這加劇了股東一年的虧損92%。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售FibroGen,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FibroGen.

在下圖中,我們放大了FibroGen的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FGEN Ownership Breakdown April 4th 2024
NASDAQGS: FGEN 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FibroGen?

關於FibroGen,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

FibroGen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FibroGen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

FibroGen已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到FibroGen的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FGEN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 4th 2024
納斯達克GS:FGEN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 4 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 9.9% of FibroGen shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is PRIMECAP Management Company, with ownership of 15%. Armistice Capital LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 9.9% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.3% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來對沖基金擁有FibroGen9.9%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。該公司的最大股東是PRIMECAP管理公司,所有權爲15%。停戰資本有限責任公司是第二大股東,擁有9.9%的普通股,貝萊德公司持有該公司約7.3%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of FibroGen

FibroGen 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in FibroGen, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$1.5m worth of stock in the US$145m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有FibroGen, Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值1.45億美元的公司價值150萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的一致性,但我們通常希望看到更多的內部持股。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 5.0% stake in FibroGen. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有FibroGen5.0%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for FibroGen (3 are concerning) that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了FibroGen的5個警告信號(其中3個令人擔憂),你應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論