share_log

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) Surges 7.4%; Retail Investors Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) Surges 7.4%; Retail Investors Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.(納斯達克股票代碼:CLMT)飆升7.4%;擁有50%股票的散戶投資者與機構一起獲利
Simply Wall St ·  04/04 03:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Calumet Specialty Products Partners by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • Institutions own 25% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners
  • 散戶投資者對Calumet特種產品合作伙伴的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 46% 的股份
  • 機構擁有 Calumet 特種產品合作伙伴 25% 的股份

A look at the shareholders of Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.(納斯達克股票代碼:CLMT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有50%所有權的散戶投資者。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$82m market cap gain, institutions too had a 25% share in those profits.

儘管散戶投資者是從上週的8200萬美元市值增長中受益最大的群體,但機構在這些利潤中也佔有25%的份額。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Calumet Specialty Products Partners.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Calumet 特種產品合作伙伴的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CLMT Ownership Breakdown April 3rd 2024
NASDAQGS: CLMT 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Calumet Specialty Products Partners?

關於Calumet特種產品合作伙伴,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Calumet Specialty Products Partners. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Calumet Specialty Products Partners' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在Calumet特種產品合作伙伴中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Calumet特種產品合作伙伴的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CLMT Earnings and Revenue Growth April 3rd 2024
納斯達克GS:CLMT收益和收入增長 2024年4月3日

It looks like hedge funds own 5.4% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that The Heritage Group is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.3% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

看來對沖基金擁有Calumet特種產品合作伙伴5.4%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,Heritage集團是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.3%和6.8%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Calumet Specialty Products Partners

Calumet 特種產品合作伙伴的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$42m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. 的部分股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約4200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 50% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Calumet特種產品合作伙伴50%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力來影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 16%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有16%的已發行股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過單獨的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Calumet Specialty Products Partners better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Calumet Specialty Products Partners (including 2 which don't sit too well with us) .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解 Calumet 特種產品合作伙伴,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們在 Calumet 特種產品合作伙伴處發現的 3 個警告信號(包括 2 個對我們來說不太合適)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論