share_log

Institutional Investors Own a Significant Stake of 36% in Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACHV)

Institutional Investors Own a Significant Stake of 36% in Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACHV)

機構投資者持有Acheive Life Sciences, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ACHV)36%的大量股份
Simply Wall St ·  04/01 21:03

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Achieve Life Sciences implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 各機構對Acheive Life Sciences的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前四名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的購買

If you want to know who really controls Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACHV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Achieve Life Sciences, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ACHV),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲36%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Achieve Life Sciences.

在下圖中,我們放大了Achieve Life Sciences的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ACHV Ownership Breakdown April 1st 2024
納斯達克公司:ACHV 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Achieve Life Sciences?

關於Achieve Life Sciences,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Achieve Life Sciences does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Achieve Life Sciences' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Achieve Life Sciences確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Achieve Life Sciences的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ACHV Earnings and Revenue Growth April 1st 2024
納斯達克公司:ACHV 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 1 日

Achieve Life Sciences is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Franklin Resources, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 7.2% of the stock.

Achieve Life Sciences 不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,富蘭克林資源公司是最大股東,已發行股份爲21%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約17%和7.2%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前四名股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Achieve Life Sciences

Achieve 生命科學的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Achieve Life Sciences, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$156m, and insiders have US$8.0m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Achieve Life Sciences, Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲1.56億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值800萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但我們通常希望看到更多的內部持有量。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Achieve Life Sciences (3 are potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了 Achieve Life Sciences 的 4 個警告信號(3 個可能很嚴重),你應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論