share_log

360 Security Technology Inc.'s (SHSE:601360) Stock Price Dropped 12% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

360 Security Technology Inc.'s (SHSE:601360) Stock Price Dropped 12% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

360 安全技術公司's(SHSE: 601360)上週股價下跌了12%;私營公司不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  03/28 13:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over 360 Security Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Insiders own 12% of 360 Security Technology
  • 私營公司對360安全技術的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 53% 的業務由前兩位股東持有
  • 內部人士擁有 360 安全科技 12% 的股份

A look at the shareholders of 360 Security Technology Inc. (SHSE:601360) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 47% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看360安全技術公司(上海證券交易所代碼:601360)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。私人公司擁有47%的股份,是該公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥8.0b.

結果,在市值下降80億元人民幣之後,私營公司作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about 360 Security Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於360安全技術的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601360 Ownership Breakdown March 28th 2024
SHSE: 601360 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 28 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About 360 Security Technology?

關於360安全技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in 360 Security Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see 360 Security Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在360安全科技中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到360 Security Technology的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601360 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 28th 2024
SHSE: 601360 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 28 日

360 Security Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Tianjin Qixin Tongda Technology Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Huan Hu is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and Hongyi Zhou holds about 5.4% of the company stock. Hongyi Zhou, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

360 安全技術不歸對沖基金所有。天津齊信通達科技有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲47%。胡歡是第二大股東,擁有 6.4% 的普通股,周宏毅持有公司約 5.4% 的股份。第三大股東周宏毅也恰好擁有董事會主席的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of 360 Security Technology

360 安全技術的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of 360 Security Technology Inc.. Insiders own CN¥6.8b worth of shares in the CN¥58b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有360安全科技公司合理比例的股份。內部人士擁有這家580億元人民幣的公司價值68億元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in 360 Security Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有360安全科技31%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 47%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司47%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論