share_log

Darbond Technology Co., Ltd's (SHSE:688035) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 17% Drop

Darbond Technology Co., Ltd's (SHSE:688035) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 17% Drop

德邦科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 688035)的頭號持有者是內部人士,他們可能對最近17%的跌幅感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  03/28 07:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Darbond Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • 10% of Darbond Technology is held by Institutions
  • 從德邦科技的大量所有權來看,內部人士似乎對德邦科技的增長有既得利益
  • 前五名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 德邦科技 10% 的股份由機構持有

If you want to know who really controls Darbond Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:688035), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 29% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了德邦科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 688035),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲29%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 17%.

上週,由於該股下跌了17%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Darbond Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究德邦科技的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688035 Ownership Breakdown March 27th 2024
SHSE: 688035 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Darbond Technology?

關於德邦科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Darbond Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Darbond Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

德邦科技已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看德邦科技過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688035 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 27th 2024
SHSE: 688035 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 27 日

Darbond Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Huaxin Investment Management Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Haihua Xie and Guocheng Lin are the second and third largest shareholders. Guocheng Lin, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the company's CEO Tianan Chen directly holds 2.2% of the total shares outstanding.

德邦科技不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,華信投資管理有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的19%。謝海華和林國成分別擁有11%和9.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第三大股東林國成也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。此外,該公司首席執行官陳天安直接持有已發行股份總額的2.2%。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前五名股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Darbond Technology

德邦科技的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Darbond Technology Co., Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.0b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有德邦科技有限公司的大量股份,該公司的市值僅爲50億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值15億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Darbond Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有德邦科技19%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的18%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Darbond Technology is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,德邦科技在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論