share_log

With 79% Ownership of the Shares, Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 79% Ownership of the Shares, Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

羅克韋爾自動化公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ROK)擁有79%的股份所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  03/26 23:40

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Rockwell Automation implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構持有羅克韋爾自動化的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 47% 的股份
  • 內部人士最近買了

A look at the shareholders of Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看羅克韋爾自動化公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ROK)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲79%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rockwell Automation, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究羅克韋爾自動化的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ROK Ownership Breakdown March 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:2024年3月26日韓國所有權明細

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rockwell Automation?

關於羅克韋爾自動化,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Rockwell Automation. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rockwell Automation's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者持有羅克韋爾自動化的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看羅克韋爾自動化的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ROK Earnings and Revenue Growth March 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:韓國收益和收入增長 2024年3月26日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rockwell Automation. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對羅克韋爾自動化進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有8.7%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約4.0%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Rockwell Automation

羅克韋爾自動化的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Rockwell Automation, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$66m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有羅克韋爾自動化公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有6600萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司21%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Rockwell Automation has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-羅克韋爾自動化有 1 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論