share_log

Individual Investors Account for 57% of Nano Dimension Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:NNDM) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 31%

Individual Investors Account for 57% of Nano Dimension Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:NNDM) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 31%

個人投資者佔納米維度有限公司的57%。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:NNDM)的所有權,而機構佔31%
Simply Wall St ·  03/26 19:48

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Nano Dimension's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
  • Institutions own 31% of Nano Dimension
  • Nano Dimension擁有大量個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 共有25名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有40%的所有權
  • 機構擁有Nano Dimension31%的股份

Every investor in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NASDAQ:NNDM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Nano Dimension Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:NNDM)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有57%所有權的個人投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 31% of the company's shareholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

同時,機構佔公司股東的31%。大公司通常以機構爲股東,我們通常會看到內部人士擁有小型公司的股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nano Dimension.

在下圖中,我們放大了Nano Dimension的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:NNDM Ownership Breakdown March 26th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:NNDM 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nano Dimension?

關於納米維度,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Nano Dimension already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nano Dimension, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Nano Dimension已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Nano Dimension過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:NNDM Earnings and Revenue Growth March 26th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:NNDM收益和收入增長 2024年3月26日

It would appear that 9.3% of Nano Dimension shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Anson Group, with ownership of 9.3%. With 9.2% and 3.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Murchinson Ltd. , Asset Management Arm and Boothbay Fund Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Yoav Stern, the CEO has 2.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

看來Nano Dimension有9.3%的股票由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是安森集團,所有權爲9.3%。默欽森有限公司、資產管理部門和Boothbay Fund Management, LLC分別佔已發行股份的9.2%和3.5%,是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現首席執行官約夫·斯特恩以其名義分配了2.1%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Nano Dimension

納米維度的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Nano Dimension Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$15m worth of the US$604m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Nano Dimension Ltd的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值6.04億美元的公司價值1500萬美元。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Nano Dimension shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Nano Dimension57%的股份。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Nano Dimension you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 1 個你應該注意的 Nano Dimension 警告標誌。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論