share_log

Does TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:THS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:THS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

TreeHouse Foods(紐約證券交易所代碼:THS)的資產負債表是否良好?
Simply Wall St ·  03/25 20:03

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (NYSE:THS) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。重要的是,樹屋食品公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:THS)確實有債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務會帶來什麼風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務可以爲企業提供幫助,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東才能控制債務。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地很好地管理債務,而且有利於自己的利益。當我們考慮公司對債務的使用時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務。

What Is TreeHouse Foods's Net Debt?

TreeHouse Foods的淨負債是多少?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that TreeHouse Foods had US$1.40b in debt in December 2023; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$320.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$1.08b.

您可以點擊下圖以獲取更多詳細信息,該圖表顯示,2023年12月,TreeHouse Foods的債務爲14.0億美元;與前一年大致相同。但是,它確實有3.203億美元的現金抵消了這一點,淨負債約爲10.8億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:THS Debt to Equity History March 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:THS 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 3 月 25 日

A Look At TreeHouse Foods' Liabilities

看看 TreeHouse Foods 的負債

According to the last reported balance sheet, TreeHouse Foods had liabilities of US$704.3m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.74b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$320.3m as well as receivables valued at US$175.6m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.95b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,TreeHouse Foods的負債爲7.043億美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲17.4億美元。除這些債務外,它有3.203億美元的現金以及價值1.756億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出19.5億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$2.05b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相對於其20.5億美元的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿率。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

TreeHouse Foods has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.1 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.9 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. However, it should be some comfort for shareholders to recall that TreeHouse Foods actually grew its EBIT by a hefty 171%, over the last 12 months. If it can keep walking that path it will be in a position to shed its debt with relative ease. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if TreeHouse Foods can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

TreeHouse Foods的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率爲3.1,其息稅前利潤覆蓋了利息支出的3.9倍。綜上所述,這意味着,儘管我們不希望債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以承受目前的槓桿率。但是,回想起TreeHouse Foods在過去12個月中實際上將其息稅前利潤大幅增長了171%,這應該讓股東感到欣慰。如果它能繼續走這條路,它將能夠相對輕鬆地減輕債務。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定TreeHouse Foods能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, TreeHouse Foods created free cash flow amounting to 4.0% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是研究息稅前利潤與實際自由現金流相匹配的比例。在過去的三年中,TreeHouse Foods創造了相當於其息稅前利潤4.0%的自由現金流,表現平淡無奇。這種低迷的現金轉換水平削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。

Our View

我們的觀點

TreeHouse Foods's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think TreeHouse Foods's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for TreeHouse Foods (1 is concerning) you should be aware of.

在我們看來,TreeHouse Foods將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流和總負債水平無疑對其造成了壓力。但其息稅前利潤增長率卻是一個截然不同的故事,也表明了一定的彈性。綜合上述因素,我們確實認爲TreeHouse Foods的債務對業務構成了一些風險。因此,儘管這種槓桿率確實提高了股本回報率,但我們真的不希望看到它從現在開始增加。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,我們已經確定了TreeHouse Foods的兩個警告信號(其中一個令人擔憂),你應該注意。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

當一切都說完之後,有時更容易將注意力集中在甚至不需要債務的公司上。讀者現在可以100%免費訪問淨負債爲零的成長型股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論