share_log

Is Bausch + Lomb (NYSE:BLCO) A Risky Investment?

Is Bausch + Lomb (NYSE:BLCO) A Risky Investment?

Bausch + Lomb(紐約證券交易所代碼:BLCO)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 22:00

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Bausch + Lomb Corporation (NYSE:BLCO) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。重要的是,Bausch + Lomb Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:BLCO)確實有債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司會永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款機構迫使他們以不利的價格籌集資金。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它取代一家有能力以高回報率進行再投資的公司的稀釋時。當我們考慮公司對債務的使用時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務。

How Much Debt Does Bausch + Lomb Carry?

Bausch + Lomb 揹負了多少債務?

As you can see below, at the end of December 2023, Bausch + Lomb had US$4.56b of debt, up from US$2.44b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. On the flip side, it has US$331.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$4.23b.

如下所示,截至2023年12月底,Bausch + Lomb的債務爲45.6億美元,高於去年同期的24.4億美元。點擊圖片查看更多細節。另一方面,它擁有3.310億美元的現金,淨負債約爲42.3億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:BLCO Debt to Equity History March 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BLCO 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 3 月 24 日

How Healthy Is Bausch + Lomb's Balance Sheet?

Bausch + Lomb 的資產負債表有多健康?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Bausch + Lomb had liabilities of US$1.58b due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.94b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$331.0m and US$875.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$5.32b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Bausch + Lomb的負債爲15.8億美元,之後到期的負債爲49.4億美元。另一方面,它有3.310億美元的現金和價值8.75億美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出53.2億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$5.68b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相對於其56.8億美元的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿率。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

Weak interest cover of 0.76 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 7.2 hit our confidence in Bausch + Lomb like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. Even more troubling is the fact that Bausch + Lomb actually let its EBIT decrease by 7.3% over the last year. If it keeps going like that paying off its debt will be like running on a treadmill -- a lot of effort for not much advancement. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Bausch + Lomb's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

0.76倍的薄弱利息覆蓋率和令人不安的高淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率7.2打擊了我們對Bausch + Lomb的信心,就像是對直覺的一二衝擊。這意味着我們會認爲它有沉重的債務負擔。更令人不安的是,Bausch + Lomb實際上讓其息稅前利潤比去年下降了7.3%。如果它繼續這樣下去,還清債務就像在跑步機上跑步一樣,付出很大的努力,但進展不大。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益將決定Bausch + Lomb未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Bausch + Lomb recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 85% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們總是檢查息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Bausch + Lomb錄得的自由現金流相當於其息稅前利潤的85%,比我們通常預期的要強。如果需要的話,這有利於償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Bausch + Lomb's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its interest cover was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. It's also worth noting that Bausch + Lomb is in the Medical Equipment industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Bausch + Lomb stock a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Bausch + Lomb .

從表面上看,Bausch + Lomb對息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的淨負債使我們對該股持初步看法,其利息保障並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。但至少在將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流方面相當不錯;這令人鼓舞。還值得注意的是,Bausch + Lomb屬於醫療設備行業,人們通常認爲該行業具有很強的防禦性。從資產負債表來看,考慮到所有這些因素,我們確實認爲債務使Bausch + Lomb的股票有點風險。這不一定是一件壞事,但我們通常會因爲降低槓桿率而感到更自在。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。爲此,你應該注意我們在 Bausch + Lomb 中發現的 1 個警告標誌。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果你有興趣投資能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增加利潤的企業,請查看這份資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論