share_log

While Institutions Invested in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) Benefited From Last Week's 6.2% Gain, Private Companies Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) Benefited From Last Week's 6.2% Gain, Private Companies Stood to Gain the Most

儘管投資超級集團(SGHC)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SGHC)的機構受益於上週6.2%的漲幅,但私營公司的收益將最大
Simply Wall St ·  03/22 22:51

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Super Group (SGHC) indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 66% ownership
  • Institutions own 27% of Super Group (SGHC)
  • 私營公司在超級集團(SGHC)中的大量所有權表明,它們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲66%
  • 機構擁有超級集團(SGHC)27%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了超級集團(SGHC)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SGHC),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有46%所有權的私營公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$1.7b last week, while institutions who own 27% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及17億美元后,私營公司漲幅最大,而持有27%的機構也從中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Super Group (SGHC), beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究超級集團(SGHC)的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SGHC Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2024
紐約證券交易所:SGHC 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Super Group (SGHC)?

關於超級集團(SGHC),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Super Group (SGHC) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Super Group (SGHC)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

超級集團(SGHC)已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到超級集團(SGHC)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SGHC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2024
紐約證券交易所:SGHC收益和收入增長 2024年3月22日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Super Group (SGHC). The company's largest shareholder is Alea Trust, with ownership of 46%. Chivers Trust, Endowment Arm is the second largest shareholder owning 20% of common stock, and Neal Menashe holds about 2.6% of the company stock. Neal Menashe, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對超級集團(SGHC)進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是Alea Trust,其所有權爲46%。Chivers Trust、Endowment Arm是第二大股東,擁有20%的普通股,尼爾·梅納什持有該公司約2.6%的股份。第三大股東尼爾·梅納什也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Super Group (SGHC)

超級集團(SGHC)的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Super Group (SGHC) Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$75m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有超級集團(SGHC)有限公司的股份。內部人士持有價值7500萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司23%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 46%, of the Super Group (SGHC) stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎擁有超級集團(SGHC)46%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Super Group (SGHC) better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Super Group (SGHC) has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解超級群組(SGHC),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-Super Group (SGHC) 有 2 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論