share_log

Institutional Investors in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) See US$97m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) See US$97m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Magnite, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:MGNI)的机构投资者上周的市值减少了9700万美元,尽管长期收益使他们受益。
Simply Wall St ·  03/22 18:33

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Magnite implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构对Magnite的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

Every investor in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Magnite, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:MGNI)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有76%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.1% in value last week. Still, the 15% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降6.1%的机构投资者。尽管如此,15%的一年期涨幅可能有助于减轻他们的总体亏损。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Magnite.

在下图中,我们放大了Magnite的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:MGNI Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2024
纳斯达克GS:MGNI 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magnite?

关于Magnite,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Magnite does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Magnite's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Magnite确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Magnite的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:MGNI Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2024
纳斯达克GS:2024年3月22日MGNI收益和收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Magnite. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.8% and 7.2% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Michael Barrett is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。对冲基金在Magnite的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股东,已发行股份为9.0%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.8%和7.2%的股份。此外,首席执行官迈克尔·巴雷特持有该公司0.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前十名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Magnite

内幕人士对 Magnite 的所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Magnite, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$34m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Magnite, Inc.的股份。内部人士持有价值3400万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司13%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 8.9%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的8.9%。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Magnite that you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们已经确定了两个你应该注意的 Magnite 警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发