share_log

Great Week for Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) Institutional Investors After Losing 33% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) Institutional Investors After Losing 33% Over the Previous Year

在去年下跌33%之後,Tredegar Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:TG)機構投資者迎來了美好的一週
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 19:28

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Tredegar's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • 17% of Tredegar is held by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着Tredegar的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • Tredegar 17% 的股份由內部人士持有

Every investor in Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Tredegar Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:TG)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲62%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Last week's US$54m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 33% losses.

機構投資者可能會對上週的5400萬美元市值收益表示讚賞,尤其是在經歷了33%的虧損之後。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Tredegar.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Tredegar的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TG Ownership Breakdown March 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:TG 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tredegar?

關於Tredegar,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Tredegar does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Tredegar, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Tredegar確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Tredegar過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TG Earnings and Revenue Growth March 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:TG 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 21 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Tredegar is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is GAMCO Investors, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 7.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO John Steitz is the owner of 1.0% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。Tredegar 不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是GAMCO Investors, Inc.,其已發行股票的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約14%和7.1%的股份。此外,首席執行官約翰·施泰茨持有該公司1.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前六名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Tredegar

Tredegar 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Tredegar Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$178m, and insiders have US$30m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Tredegar公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲1.78億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3000萬美元的股票。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.1%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司7.1%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Tredegar is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those make us uncomfortable...

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Tredegar在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個警告信號,其中2個使我們感到不舒服...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論