share_log

Intchains Group Limited's (NASDAQ:ICG) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Qiang Ding Must Be Pleased With the Recent 12% Gain

Intchains Group Limited's (NASDAQ:ICG) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Qiang Ding Must Be Pleased With the Recent 12% Gain

Intchains集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ICG)最看漲的內部人士、首席執行官丁強一定對最近12%的漲幅感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  03/16 22:40

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Intchains Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 3 shareholders own 58% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 對Intchains集團的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 前三名股東擁有公司58%的股份
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Intchains Group Limited (NASDAQ:ICG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Intchains集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ICG),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團是內部人士,準確地說是75%左右。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$569m market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲12%後達到5.69億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Intchains Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Intchains集團的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ICG Ownership Breakdown March 16th 2024
納斯達克公司:ICG 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 16 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intchains Group?

關於Intchains集團,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Intchains Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構爲何不擁有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,公司相對於所管理的資金來說規模太小,因此該機構不願仔細研究該公司。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。Intchains集團可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ICG Earnings and Revenue Growth March 16th 2024
納斯達克公司:ICG收益和收入增長 2024年3月16日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Intchains Group. With a 29% stake, CEO Qiang Ding is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Chaohua Sheng is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在Intchains集團的股份不多。首席執行官丁強持有29%的股份,是最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的14%和14%。有趣的是,第三大股東盛朝華也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 58% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,有3位大股東通過其58%的股份擁有該公司相當大的所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Intchains Group

Intchains集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Intchains Group Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of US$569m, that means they have US$428m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Intchains集團有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。鑑於其市值爲5.69億美元,這意味着他們擁有價值4.28億美元的股票。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Intchains Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Intchains集團15%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 10.0%, of the Intchains Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有Intchains集團10.0%的股票。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Intchains Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Intchains Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Intchains集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經向Intchains集團確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論