share_log

Lakeland Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:LKFN) Recent 5.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Lakeland Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:LKFN) Recent 5.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

莱克兰金融公司(纳斯达克股票代码:LKFN)最近5.8%的回调增加了为期一年的亏损,机构所有者可能会采取严厉措施
Simply Wall St ·  03/15 19:22

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lakeland Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着Lakeland Financial的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 51% 的业务由前 9 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

If you want to know who really controls Lakeland Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:LKFN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了莱克兰金融公司(纳斯达克股票代码:LKFN),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.6b last week after a 5.8% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 7.6% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Lakeland Financial's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,上周该公司的市值在股价下跌5.8%后跌至16亿美元,因此机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。毋庸置疑,最近的亏损进一步加剧了7.6%的股东一年亏损,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是对于这类股东而言。机构或 “流动性提供者” 控制着大量资金,因此,这些类型的投资者通常对股价走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果Lakeland Financial的股价持续疲软,机构投资者可能会感到不得不出售该股票,这对于个人投资者来说可能并不理想。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lakeland Financial, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Lakeland Financial的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LKFN Ownership Breakdown March 15th 2024
NASDAQGS: LKFN 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lakeland Financial?

关于莱克兰金融,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lakeland Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lakeland Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者持有莱克兰金融的相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Lakeland Financial的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LKFN Earnings and Revenue Growth March 15th 2024
纳斯达克GS: LKFN收益和收入增长 2024年3月15日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Lakeland Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 6.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that David Findlay, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。莱克兰金融不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份的15%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.2%和6.4%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官戴维·芬德利以其名义分配了0.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前9名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Lakeland Financial

莱克兰金融的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lakeland Financial Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$47m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有莱克兰金融公司的股份。内部人士持有价值4700万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lakeland Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Lakeland Financial拥有14%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对莱克兰金融有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Lakeland Financial (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了 Lakeland Financial 的 2 个警告信号(1 个很重要!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发