share_log

Northern Dynasty Files Two Separate Actions: Seeking to Vacate EPA's Illegal Veto and a Takings Case

Northern Dynasty Files Two Separate Actions: Seeking to Vacate EPA's Illegal Veto and a Takings Case

北王朝分別提起兩項訴訟:尋求撤銷環保局的非法否決權和收繳案
Accesswire ·  03/15 18:30

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2024 / Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (TSX:NDM)(NYSE American:NAK) ("Northern Dynasty" or the "Company") and 100%-owned U.S.-based subsidiary Pebble Limited Partnership ("Pebble Partnership" or "PLP") is filing two separate actions in the federal courts challenging the federal government's actions to prevent the companies from building a mine at the Pebble Project.

不列顛哥倫比亞省溫哥華/ACCESSWIRE /2024年3月15日/北朝礦業有限公司(多倫多證券交易所股票代碼:NDM)(紐約證券交易所美國股票代碼:NAK)(“北王朝” 或 “公司”)和總部位於美國的100%控股子公司Pebble有限合夥企業(“Pebble Partnership” 或 “PLP”)正在聯邦法院分別提起兩項訴訟,質疑聯邦政府阻止兩家公司在Pebble項目建造礦山的行動。

Action Seeks to overturn EPA's illegal veto

行動旨在推翻EPA的非法否決權

One action, in Federal District Court in Alaska, seeks to vacate the Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA") veto of a development at Pebble. This is the main focus of our legal actions. We are confident that the court will vacate the EPA veto and allow permitting of the Pebble project to resume because, as we have previously stated, the veto violated the law and was arbitrary and capricious. The complaint in this action alleges, among many other points, the veto was issued in violation of various federal statutes regarding Alaska's statehood rights and a land exchange approved by Congress; it was based on an overly broad legal interpretation of EPA's jurisdiction which has since been over-ruled by the Supreme Court; its geographic scope exceeds that allowed by the statute; it was based on information previously developed by EPA in an illegal preemptive veto process that was designed to reach a predetermined result; and the factual basis stated to support the veto is directly contradicted by the July 2020 Environmental Impact Statement published by the United States Army Corps of Engineers ("USACE"), which is an important part of the administrative record. The EPA has not demonstrated that either the development of the Pebble deposit will have unacceptable adverse effects under Section 404(c), or that there are any impacts to Bristol Bay fisheries that would justify the extreme measures in the final determination (veto).

阿拉斯加聯邦地方法院的一項訴訟旨在撤銷環境保護署(“EPA”)對Pebble開發項目的否決權。這是我們法律行動的主要重點。我們相信,法院將撤銷美國環保局的否決權,允許恢復對Pebble項目的許可,因爲正如我們之前所說,否決權違反了法律,是武斷和反覆無常的。該訴訟中的申訴聲稱,除其他外,否決權的頒佈違反了關於阿拉斯加州權和國會批准的土地交換的各種聯邦法規;否決權基於對環保局管轄權的過於寬泛的法律解釋,但後來被最高法院駁回;其地理範圍超出了該法規允許的範圍;它基於環保局先前在旨在達成先發制人的非法否決程序中提供的信息確定的結果;以及陳述的事實依據支持否決權與美國陸軍工程兵團(“USACE”)發佈的2020年7月環境影響聲明直接矛盾,該聲明是行政記錄的重要組成部分。美國環保局沒有證明,根據第404(c)條,卵石礦牀的開發將產生不可接受的不利影響,也沒有證明對布里斯托爾灣漁業的任何影響可以證明在最終決定(否決權)中採取極端措施是合理的。

"Whatever authority the EPA may have under section 404(c), the general provision in the Clean Water Act cannot authorize the EPA to take action to block the specific economic activity that was Congress's express purpose for granting these lands to the State of Alaska under the Cook Inlet Land Exchange," Ron Thiessen, Northern Dynasty President and CEO, stated. "It cannot authorize the EPA to override the State's regulatory preferences for the lands, or the State's preference to allow modest use of some streams and wetlands in the vicinity of the Deposit to facilitate the extraction of the valuable critical minerals. This is just another example of gross EPA overreach of the powers granted to it by Congress."

北朝總裁兼首席執行官羅恩·蒂森表示:“無論美國環保局根據第404(c)條擁有什麼權限,《清潔水法》中的一般條款都不能授權環保局採取行動阻止國會根據庫克灣土地交易所將這些土地授予阿拉斯加州的明確目的。”“它不能授權環保局推翻該州對土地的監管偏好,也不能授權該州傾向於適度使用礦牀附近的一些溪流和溼地以促進寶貴的關鍵礦物的開採。這只是美國環保局嚴重超越國會賦予的權力的又一個例子。”

Takings case

Takings 案例

An action is also being filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims in Washington, DC, claiming that the actions by the EPA constitute an unconstitutional "taking" of Northern Dynasty's and the Pebble Partnership's property. We plan to ask the court to defer considering this action until the EPA veto case, discussed above, has been finally resolved. Our permitting strategy is focused entirely on winning the EPA veto case and permitting the Pebble project. We have filed a takings case against the federal government to preserve our ability to seek compensation for a violation of our rights in line with the protections under the Fifth Amendment. There are procedural rules regarding takings cases that made it necessary to get this claim on file at this time. We note, however, that the damages for "taking" the world's largest undeveloped copper deposit could be very substantial.

華盛頓特區的美國聯邦索賠法院也正在提起訴訟,聲稱環保局的行動構成了對北朝和Pebble Partnership財產的違憲行爲。我們計劃要求法院推遲對這一行動的審議,直到上文討論的環保局否決案最終得到解決。我們的許可策略完全側重於贏得美國環保局的否決權並允許Pebble項目。我們已經對聯邦政府提起了受理訴訟,以保持我們根據第五修正案的保護措施爲侵犯我們的權利行爲尋求賠償的能力。根據有關受理案件的程序規則,此時必須將該索賠存檔。但是,我們注意到,“佔用” 世界上最大的未開發銅礦牀所造成的損失可能非常巨大。

"Our priority is to advance the District Federal Court Complaint, because overturning the illegal veto removes a major impediment from the path of getting the permit to build the proposed mine," said Ron Thiessen, Northern Dynasty President and CEO. "The filing of the takings complaint puts the US Government on notice that we will be seeking very substantial compensation if they continue to illegally block the lawful permitting process. It is basically an insurance policy, ensuring that this case is available to us when, or if, we decide to pursue it further," Mr. Thiessen continued.

北朝總統兼首席執行官羅恩·蒂森說:“我們的首要任務是推進地區聯邦法院的申訴,因爲推翻非法否決權可以消除獲得建造擬議礦山許可的主要障礙。”“提出收繳申訴使美國政府注意到,如果他們繼續非法封鎖合法的許可程序,我們將尋求非常可觀的賠償。它基本上是一份保險單,可確保我們在決定進一步追查時或是否能夠處理此案。” 蒂森繼續說道。

The State of Alaska will also be filing similar actions in Federal District Court in Alaska and the United States Court of Federal Claims in Washington, DC.

阿拉斯加州還將向阿拉斯加聯邦地方法院和華盛頓特區的美國聯邦索賠法院提起類似的訴訟。

About Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

關於北朝礦業有限公司

Northern Dynasty is a mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver, Canada. Northern Dynasty's principal asset, owned through its wholly owned Alaska-based U.S. subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska, including the Pebble deposit, located 200 miles from Anchorage and 125 miles from Bristol Bay. The Pebble Partnership is the proponent of the Pebble Project.

Northern Dynasty是一家礦產勘探和開發公司,總部位於加拿大溫哥華。Northern Dynasty的主要資產由其在阿拉斯加的全資美國子公司Pebble Limited Partnership擁有,是阿拉斯加西南部一塊連續的1,840塊礦產索賠的100%權益,其中包括距離安克雷奇200英里、距離布里斯托爾灣125英里的Pebble礦牀。Pebble Partnership 是 Pebble 項目的支持者。

For further details on Northern Dynasty and the Pebble Project, please visit the Company's website at or contact Investor services at (604) 684-6365 or within North America at 1- 800-667-2114. Review public filings, which include forward looking information cautionary language and risk factor disclosure regarding the Company and the Pebble Project in Canada at and in the United States at www.sec.gov.

有關北朝和卵石項目的更多詳情,請訪問該公司的網站或致電(604)684-6365聯繫投資者服務部,或致電北美境內的1-800-667-2114與投資者服務部聯繫。在www.sec.gov上查看公開文件,其中包括有關公司和加拿大Pebble項目的前瞻性信息、警告性語言和風險因素披露,以及在美國和美國的Pebble項目。

Ronald W. Thiessen
President & CEO

羅納德·W·蒂森
總裁兼首席執行官

U.S. Media Contact:
Dan Gagnier, Gagnier Communications (646) 569-5897

美國媒體聯繫人:
Dan Gagnier,Gagnier Communications (646) 569-

Forward Looking Information and other Cautionary Factors

前瞻性信息和其他警示因素

This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements" under the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and under applicable provisions of Canadian provincial securities laws. All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, which address permitting, including the legal actions described above, development and production for the Pebble Project are forward-looking statements. These include statements regarding: (i) the ability of the Pebble Project to ultimately secure all required federal and state permits; (ii) if permitting is ultimately secured, the ability to demonstrate that the Pebble Project is commercially viable; (iii) the ability of the Company and/or the State of Alaska to successfully challenge the EPA's Final Determination process under the Clean Water Act, including the legal actions described above; and (iv) the ability of the Company to secure the significant additional financing to fund these objectives as well as ultimately funding mine construction, for which financing may not be available to NDM on acceptable terms or on any terms at all.

本新聞稿包括根據1995年《美國私人證券訴訟改革法》和加拿大省級證券法的適用條款可能被視爲 “前瞻性陳述” 的某些陳述。除歷史事實陳述外,本新聞稿中涉及Pebble Project開發和生產的許可(包括上述法律訴訟)的所有陳述均爲前瞻性陳述。其中包括有關以下內容的聲明:(i)Pebble Project最終獲得所有必需的聯邦和州許可的能力;(ii)如果最終獲得許可,則證明Pebble項目具有商業可行性的能力;(iii)公司和/或阿拉斯加州成功質疑美國環保局在《清潔水法》下的最終裁決程序的能力,包括上述法律訴訟;以及(iv)公司保護該項目的能力爲這些目標提供大量額外資金,以及最終爲礦山建設提供資金,NDM可能無法以可接受的條件或任何條件提供這方面的融資。

Although NDM believes the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements should not be in any way be construed as guarantees that the Pebble Project will secure all required government and environmental permits, regarding the ability of NDM to develop the Pebble Projects in light of the EPA's Final Determination or regarding NDM's ability to secure significant additional financing.

儘管NDM認爲這些前瞻性陳述中表達的預期是基於合理的假設,但不應以任何方式將此類陳述解釋爲Pebble項目將獲得所有必需的政府和環境許可,這些許可涉及NDM根據EPA的最終決定開發Pebble項目的能力或NDM獲得大量額外融資的能力。

Assumptions used by NDM to develop forward-looking statements include the following assumptions: (i) the Pebble Project will ultimately obtain all required environmental and other permits and all land use and other licenses; (ii) NDM will be successful in its legal action against the EPA and any action taken by the EPA in connection with the Final Determination will ultimately not be successful in restricting or prohibiting development of the Pebble Project; and (iii) the Company or its subsidiaries will be able to secure significant additional financing.

NDM在制定前瞻性陳述時使用的假設包括以下假設:(i)Pebble項目最終將獲得所有必需的環境和其他許可證以及所有土地使用和其他許可;(ii)NDM將成功對EPA提起法律訴訟,EPA就最終決定採取的任何行動最終都不會成功限制或禁止Pebble項目的開發;(iii)公司或其子公司將能夠確保大量額外融資。

NDM is also subject to the specific risks inherent in the mining business as well as general economic and business conditions. Investors should also consider the risk factors identified in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2022, as filed on SEDAR plus and included in the Company's annual report on Form 40-F filed by the Company with the SEC on EDGAR, and the Company's Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2022, and nine months ended September 30, 2023, each as filed on SEDAR plus and EDGAR, for a discussion of the risks that may impact our forward-looking statements.

NDM還受到採礦業務固有的特定風險以及總體經濟和商業狀況的影響。投資者還應考慮公司在SEDAR plus上提交的截至2022年12月31日年度的年度信息表中確定的風險因素,這些風險因素包含在公司向美國證券交易委員會提交的關於EDGAR的40-F表年度報告中,以及在SEDAR plus和EDGAR上提交的截至2022年12月31日的年度和截至2023年9月30日的九個月的公司管理層討論與分析,以討論可能影響我們的前瞻性陳述的風險。

The National Environment Policy Act Environmental Impact Statement process requires a comprehensive "alternatives assessment" be undertaken to consider a broad range of development alternatives, the final project design and operating parameters for the Pebble Project and associated infrastructure may vary significantly from that currently contemplated. As a result, the Company will continue to consider various development options and no final project design has been selected at this time.

《國家環境政策法案環境影響聲明》程序要求進行全面的 “替代評估”,以考慮廣泛的發展替代方案,Pebble項目和相關基礎設施的最終項目設計和運營參數可能與目前設想的有很大差異。因此,公司將繼續考慮各種開發方案,目前尚未選擇最終的項目設計。

For more information on the Company, Investors should review the Company's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and its home jurisdiction filings that are available at .

有關該公司的更多信息,投資者應查看公司向美國證券交易委員會提交的文件,網址爲www.sec.gov,以及其所在司法管轄區的文件,可在以下網址查閱。

SOURCE: Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

來源:北朝礦業有限公司


譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論