share_log

Insiders Continue to Buy Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) and Now Own 55% Shares

Insiders Continue to Buy Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) and Now Own 55% Shares

业内人士继续收购格林威治生命科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GLSI),现在拥有55%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  03/12 19:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Greenwich LifeSciences' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 业内人士似乎对格林威治生命科学的增长有既得利益,从他们庞大的所有权可以看出
  • 前四名股东拥有公司52%的股份
  • 内部人士最近买了

Every investor in Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

格林威治生命科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GLSI)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有55%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Our data shows that insiders recently bought shares in the company and they were rewarded after market cap rose US$61m last week.

我们的数据显示,内部人士最近购买了该公司的股票,并在上周市值上涨6100万美元后获得了回报。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Greenwich LifeSciences, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究格林威治生命科学的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:GLSI Ownership Breakdown March 12th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:GLSI 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenwich LifeSciences?

关于格林威治生命科学,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Greenwich LifeSciences, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由于机构仅拥有格林威治生命科学的一小部分股份,因此许多机构可能没有花太多时间考虑这只股票。但很明显,有些人有;他们很喜欢它,足以买进。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而有所改善,那么将来我们很可能会看到更多的机构买家。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:GLSI Earnings and Revenue Growth March 12th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:GLSI 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 12 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Greenwich LifeSciences. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Snehal Patel with 42% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Kenneth Hallock is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对格林威治生命科学进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官斯内哈尔·帕特尔,其已发行股份为42%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约4.8%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有3.1%的所有权。有趣的是,第三大股东肯尼思·哈洛克也是董事会成员,这再次表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四名股东控制着公司一半以上的股份,这意味着该集团对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Greenwich LifeSciences

格林威治生命科学的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$124m stake in this US$227m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有格林威治生命科学公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决定。因此,他们在这笔2.27亿美元的业务中拥有1.24亿美元的股份。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greenwich LifeSciences. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有41%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对格林威治生命科学有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Greenwich LifeSciences (of which 2 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现了格林威治生命科学的4个警告信号(其中2个不容忽视!)你应该知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发