share_log

Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600507) Market Cap Surged CN¥373m Last Week, Individual Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600507) Market Cap Surged CN¥373m Last Week, Individual Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

方大特鋼科技有限公司's (SHSE: 600507) 上週市值飆升3.73億元人民幣,對公司有很大影響的個人投資者獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  03/08 07:36

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Fangda Special Steel Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 個人投資者對方大特鋼科技的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有17名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

A look at the shareholders of Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600507) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看方大特鋼科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 600507)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有48%所有權的個人投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥373m last week.

顯然,在上週該公司的市值上漲了3.73億元人民幣之後,個人投資者受益最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fangda Special Steel Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究方大特鋼科技的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600507 Ownership Breakdown March 7th 2024
SHSE: 600507 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fangda Special Steel Technology?

關於方大特鋼科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Fangda Special Steel Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fangda Special Steel Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,方大特鋼科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看方大特鋼科技的盈利記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600507 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 7th 2024
SHSE: 600507 2024 年 3 月 7 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fangda Special Steel Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Beijing Fangda International Industrial Investment Co., Ltd., with ownership of 31%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對方大特鋼科技進行有意義的投資。公司的最大股東是北京方大國際工業投資有限公司,持股31%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約7.5%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.0%的所有權。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前17名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Fangda Special Steel Technology

方大特鋼科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥694m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有方大特鋼科技有限公司的部分股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約6.94億元人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司48%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 39%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有39%的已發行股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Fangda Special Steel Technology .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意我們在方大特鋼科技中發現的兩個警告標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論