share_log

Individual Investors Account for 49% of Singapore Exchange Limited's (SGX:S68) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 27%

Individual Investors Account for 49% of Singapore Exchange Limited's (SGX:S68) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 27%

個人投資者佔新加坡交易所有限公司(SGX: S68)所有權的49%,而機構佔27%
Simply Wall St ·  03/03 08:21

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Singapore Exchange indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Singapore Exchange is 27%
  • 個人投資者在新加坡交易所擁有的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 46% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 新加坡交易所的機構所有權爲27%

Every investor in Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX:S68) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

新加坡交易所有限公司(SGX: S68)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲49%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 27% of the company's stockholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

另一方面,機構佔公司股東的27%。機構通常擁有比較成熟的公司的股份,而內部人士擁有相當一部分小型公司的情況並不少見。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Singapore Exchange, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究新加坡交易所的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:S68 Ownership Breakdown March 3rd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:S68 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Singapore Exchange?

關於新加坡交易所,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Singapore Exchange already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Singapore Exchange, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

新加坡交易所已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下新加坡交易所過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:S68 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 3rd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:S68 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 3 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Singapore Exchange. The company's largest shareholder is Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, with ownership of 23%. With 3.0% and 2.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and JP Morgan Asset Management are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金在新加坡交易所沒有有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是淡馬錫控股(私人)有限公司,所有權爲23%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和摩根大通資產管理公司分別擁有3.0%和2.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Singapore Exchange

新加坡交易所的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Singapore Exchange Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around S$59m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,新加坡交易所有限公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約5900萬新元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司49%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有23%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論