share_log

With 84% Institutional Ownership, Western Alliance Bancorporation (NYSE:WAL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 84% Institutional Ownership, Western Alliance Bancorporation (NYSE:WAL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

西方聯盟銀行(紐約證券交易所代碼:WAL)擁有84%的機構所有權,是大佬的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  02/18 21:56

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Western Alliance Bancorporation implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 各機構持有西方聯盟銀行的大量股權意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前14名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

Every investor in Western Alliance Bancorporation (NYSE:WAL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

西方聯盟銀行(紐約證券交易所代碼:WAL)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲84%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Western Alliance Bancorporation.

在下圖中,我們放大了西方聯盟銀行的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:WAL Ownership Breakdown February 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:WAL 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Western Alliance Bancorporation?

關於西方聯盟銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Western Alliance Bancorporation already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Western Alliance Bancorporation's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

西方聯盟銀行已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到西方聯盟銀行的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WAL Earnings and Revenue Growth February 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:WAL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 18 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Western Alliance Bancorporation is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.0% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。西方聯盟銀行不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份佔9.3%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.0%和5.2%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前14名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Western Alliance Bancorporation

西方聯盟銀行的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Western Alliance Bancorporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$342m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有西方聯盟銀行的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3.42億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Western Alliance Bancorporation. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有西方聯盟銀行10%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Western Alliance Bancorporation that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了西方聯盟銀行的兩個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論