share_log

The One-year Returns for Gorman-Rupp's (NYSE:GRC) Shareholders Have Been Respectable, yet Its Earnings Growth Was Even Better

The One-year Returns for Gorman-Rupp's (NYSE:GRC) Shareholders Have Been Respectable, yet Its Earnings Growth Was Even Better

Gorman-Rupp(紐約證券交易所代碼:GRC)股東的一年回報率可觀,但其收益增長甚至更好
Simply Wall St ·  02/09 21:49

These days it's easy to simply buy an index fund, and your returns should (roughly) match the market. But you can significantly boost your returns by picking above-average stocks. For example, the The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) share price is up 30% in the last 1 year, clearly besting the market return of around 20% (not including dividends). That's a solid performance by our standards! However, the longer term returns haven't been so impressive, with the stock up just 13% in the last three years.

如今,簡單地購買指數基金很容易,而且您的回報應該(大致)與市場相匹配。但是,您可以通過選擇高於平均水平的股票來顯著提高回報。例如,高爾曼-魯普公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:GRC)的股價在過去1年中上漲了30%,顯然超過了約20%(不包括股息)的市場回報率。按照我們的標準,這是一項不錯的表現!但是,長期回報並不那麼令人印象深刻,該股在過去三年中僅上漲了13%。

Since the stock has added US$51m to its market cap in the past week alone, let's see if underlying performance has been driving long-term returns.

由於該股僅在過去一週的市值就增加了5100萬美元,因此讓我們看看基礎表現是否推動了長期回報。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:從短期來看,市場是一臺投票機器,但從長遠來看,它是一臺稱重機。研究市場情緒如何隨着時間的推移而變化的一種方法是研究公司股價與其每股收益(EPS)之間的相互作用。

Gorman-Rupp was able to grow EPS by 212% in the last twelve months. It's fair to say that the share price gain of 30% did not keep pace with the EPS growth. So it seems like the market has cooled on Gorman-Rupp, despite the growth. Interesting.

在過去的十二個月中,高爾曼-魯普得以將每股收益增長212%。可以公平地說,30%的股價漲幅跟不上每股收益的增長。因此,儘管有所增長,但Gorman-Rupp的市場似乎已經降溫。有意思。

The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下圖顯示了 EPS 在一段時間內的跟蹤情況(如果你點擊圖片,你可以看到更多細節)。

earnings-per-share-growth
NYSE:GRC Earnings Per Share Growth February 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GRC每股收益增長 2024年2月9日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. This free interactive report on Gorman-Rupp's earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

我們很高興地向大家報告,首席執行官的薪酬比資本相似公司的大多數首席執行官要適中。但是,儘管首席執行官的薪酬總是值得檢查的,但真正重要的問題是公司未來能否增加收益。如果你想進一步調查該股,這份關於Gorman-Rupp收益、收入和現金流的免費互動報告是一個很好的起點。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Gorman-Rupp the TSR over the last 1 year was 33%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司來說,股東總回報率通常遠高於股價回報率。我們注意到,對於Gorman-Rupp而言,過去1年的股東總回報率爲33%,好於上述股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

We're pleased to report that Gorman-Rupp shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 33% over one year. And that does include the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 4%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Gorman-Rupp , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我們很高興地向大家報告,Gorman-Rupp的股東在一年內獲得了33%的總股東回報率。這確實包括股息。這一增幅好於五年內的年度股東總回報率,即4%。因此,最近公司周圍的情緒似乎一直很樂觀。持樂觀態度的人可能會將最近股東總回報率的改善視爲業務本身隨着時間的推移而變得更好。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Gorman-Rupp發現了一個警告信號,我們知道它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But note: Gorman-Rupp may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但請注意:高爾曼-魯普可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,來看看這份過去盈利增長(以及進一步增長預測)的有趣公司的免費清單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論