Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Hubei Jianghan New Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603281) Touches CN¥10b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Hubei Jianghan New Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603281) Touches CN¥10b Market Cap
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Hubei Jianghan New Materials' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 業內人士似乎對湖北江漢新材的增長有既得利益,從其龐大的所有權中可以看出
- 共有11名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有深刻的了解
A look at the shareholders of Hubei Jianghan New Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603281) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看湖北江漢新材料股份有限公司(SHSE: 603281)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有52%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥683m last week.
顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了6.83億元人民幣之後,內部人士受益最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hubei Jianghan New Materials.
在下圖中,我們放大了湖北江漢新材的不同所有權群體。
Check out our latest analysis for Hubei Jianghan New Materials
查看我們對湖北江漢新材的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hubei Jianghan New Materials?
關於湖北江漢新材,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Hubei Jianghan New Materials, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
由於機構僅擁有湖北江漢新材的一小部分股份,許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hubei Jianghan New Materials. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shuguan Gan with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.2% and 6.4% of the stock. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company. Furthermore, CEO Jun Gan is the owner of 5.4% of the company's shares.
對沖基金在湖北江漢新材的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是甘樹冠,其已發行股份的10%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.2%和6.4%的股份。有趣的是,前三名股東中倒數第二的股東還分別持有高級管理人員和董事會成員的頭銜,這表明這些內部人士在公司擁有個人股份。此外,首席執行官甘俊是公司5.4%股份的所有者。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前11名股東擁有公司50%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有一些分析師對該股進行了報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Hubei Jianghan New Materials
湖北江漢新材內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Hubei Jianghan New Materials Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥10b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥5.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
看來內部人士擁有湖北江漢新材料有限公司一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。鑑於其市值爲10億元人民幣,這意味着內部人士以自己的名義擁有高達53億元人民幣的股票。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 46% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司46%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決策向他們傾斜,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hubei Jianghan New Materials better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hubei Jianghan New Materials you should be aware of.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解湖北江漢新材,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了一個你應該注意的湖北江漢新材的警告標誌。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。