share_log

Great Week for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ:WERN) Institutional Investors After Losing 9.7% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ:WERN) Institutional Investors After Losing 9.7% Over the Previous Year

沃納企業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:WERN)機構投資者在同比下跌9.7%之後,本週表現不錯
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/15 21:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Werner Enterprises' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構所有權居高不下意味着Werner Enterprises的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有9名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Werner Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ:WERN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着維爾納企業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:WERN),了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有86%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's US$77m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 9.7% losses.

上週市值上漲的7700萬美元可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,尤其是在連續一年下跌9.7%之後。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Werner Enterprises, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下表開始,更深入地研究Werner Enterprises的每種類型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Werner Enterprises

查看我們對維爾納企業的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WERN Ownership Breakdown November 15th 2023
納斯達克股票代碼:WERN 所有權明細 2023 年 11 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Werner Enterprises?

關於維爾納企業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Werner Enterprises. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Werner Enterprises' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者持有Werner Enterprises的相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者提供的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得在下面看一下沃納企業的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WERN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 15th 2023
納斯達克股票代碼:WERN 2023 年 11 月 15 日收益和收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Werner Enterprises. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.2% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Derek Leathers, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金對Werner Enterprises沒有有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是貝萊德公司,擁有13%的已發行股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.2%和7.1%。此外,我們發現,首席執行官德里克·萊瑟斯將0.5%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現9位大股東約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Werner Enterprises

維爾納企業的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Werner Enterprises, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$30m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Werner Enterprises, Inc.的部分股份。內部人士持有價值3000萬美元的有意義的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果你想探討內幕人士一致性的問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Werner Enterprises that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了 Werner Enterprises 的 3 個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論