share_log

Individual Investors Who Own 45% Along With Institutions Invested in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Individual Investors Who Own 45% Along With Institutions Invested in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

持有45%的个人投资者以及投资Solid Power, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:SLDP)的机构上周的持股价值有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/24 21:43

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Solid Power indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 个人投资者对Solid Power的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 前25名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 内部人士最近买了

Every investor in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Solid Power, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:SLDP)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。而占据最大份额的集团是拥有45%所有权的个人投资者。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。

Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$407m last week, while institutions who own 30% also benefitted.

在上周市值触及4.07亿美元之后,个人投资者涨幅最大,而拥有30%的机构也从中受益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Solid Power.

在下图中,我们放大了 Solid Power 的不同所有权组。

See our latest analysis for Solid Power

查看我们对 Solid Power 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SLDP Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2023
纳斯达克集团:SLDP 所有权明细 2023 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Solid Power?

关于 Solid Power,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Solid Power. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Solid Power, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者持有Solid Power的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所带来的假定验证。他们也是,有时候会错的。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看Solid Power过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SLDP Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2023
纳斯达克集团:SLDP 收益和收入增长 2023 年 5 月 24 日

Solid Power is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Ford Motor Company, with ownership of 6.5%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that David Jansen, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

Solid Power 不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是福特汽车公司,所有权为6.5%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的5.9%和5.2%。此外,我们发现首席执行官戴维·詹森将0.9%的股份分配给了他们的名字。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前25名股东的合并所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个单一股东拥有多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Solid Power

Solid Power 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Solid Power, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$32m worth of the US$407m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Solid Power, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值4.07亿美元的公司价值3200万美元。这至少显示出一定的对齐情况。你可以点击这里查看那些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司45%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决定对他们有利,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 5.2% stake in Solid Power. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司持有Solid Power5.2%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中产生影响。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资不多。一段时间后,他们可能会寻求出售资本并将资本重新部署到其他地方。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 12% of Solid Power stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前拥有Solid Power12%的股份。很难肯定地说,但这表明它们将商业利益交织在一起。这可能是一个战略风险,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变化。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Solid Power has 4 warning signs (and 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。以冒险为例——Solid Power 有 4 个警告标志 (还有 1 个对我们来说不太合适)我们认为你应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这篇文章 免费的 分析师预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发