share_log

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Transocean Ltd.(纽约证券交易所代码:RIG)拥有69%的股份所有权,主要由机构所有者主导
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/22 18:04

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Transocean's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 机构所有权居高不下意味着越洋的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 51% 的业务由前 12 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近买了

A look at the shareholders of Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看越洋有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:RIG)的股东就可以知道哪个集团最强大。机构拥有69%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构可以获得大量资金,因此他们的市场走势往往会受到散户或个人投资者的严格审查。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为理想的特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Transocean.

在下图中,我们放大了Transocean的不同所有权组。

View our latest analysis for Transocean

查看我们对越洋的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RIG Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2023
纽约证券交易所:钻机所有权明细 2023 年 5 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Transocean?

关于越洋,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Transocean already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Transocean, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

越洋已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看Transocean过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RIG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2023
纽约证券交易所:RIG 收益和收入增长 2023 年 5 月 22 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Transocean. The company's largest shareholder is Perestroika AS, with ownership of 11%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在越洋的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是Perestroika AS,所有权为11%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的8.6%和6.0%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前12位的公司合并所有权为51%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Transocean

越洋的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Transocean Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到,内部人士拥有越洋有限公司的股份。这是一家大公司,所以很高兴看到这种协调水平。内部人士拥有价值4700万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看那些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Transocean. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有越洋19%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决定对他们有利,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 11%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有已发行股份的11%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私营公司对上市公司的股票感兴趣。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Transocean that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了 Transocean 有 1 个警告标志 你应该知道的。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这篇文章 免费的 分析师预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发