share_log

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Transocean Ltd.(紐約證券交易所代碼:RIG)擁有69%的股份所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/22 18:04

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Transocean's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構所有權居高不下意味着越洋的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

A look at the shareholders of Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看越洋有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:RIG)的股東就可以知道哪個集團最強大。機構擁有69%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Transocean.

在下圖中,我們放大了Transocean的不同所有權組。

View our latest analysis for Transocean

查看我們對越洋的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RIG Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2023
紐約證券交易所:鑽機所有權明細 2023 年 5 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Transocean?

關於越洋,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Transocean already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Transocean, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

越洋已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Transocean過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RIG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2023
紐約證券交易所:RIG 收益和收入增長 2023 年 5 月 22 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Transocean. The company's largest shareholder is Perestroika AS, with ownership of 11%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在越洋的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是Perestroika AS,所有權爲11%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.6%和6.0%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前12位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Transocean

越洋的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Transocean Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有越洋有限公司的股份。這是一家大公司,所以很高興看到這種協調水平。內部人士擁有價值4700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看那些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Transocean. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有越洋19%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 11%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的11%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私營公司對上市公司的股票感興趣。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Transocean that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了 Transocean 有 1 個警告標誌 你應該知道的。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這篇文章 免費的 分析師預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論