share_log

Positive Week for EBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) Institutional Investors Who Lost 20% Over the Past Year

Positive Week for EBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) Institutional Investors Who Lost 20% Over the Past Year

对于在过去一年中损失了20%的eBay Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:EBAY)机构投资者来说,本周是积极的
Simply Wall St ·  2023/03/22 21:26

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies eBay's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构所有权显著高意味着eBay的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前21位股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了eBay Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:EBAY),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有89%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 7.2% increase in share prices after a year of 20% losses as a sign that returns are likely to begin trending higher.

机构投资者可能会对上周股价在一年下跌20%之后上涨7.2%表示欢迎,这表明回报率可能开始呈上升趋势。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about eBay.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于eBay的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for eBay

查看我们对 eBay 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:EBAY Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2023
纳斯达克:eBay 所有权明细 2023 年 3 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About eBay?

关于eBay,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in eBay. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see eBay's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所见,机构投资者在eBay中拥有相当多的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票并且他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,他们总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有成长历史的公司来说,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到eBay的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总会有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:EBAY Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2023
纳斯达克股票代码:eBay 收益和收入增长 2023 年 3 月 22 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in eBay. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此合在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在eBay的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc. 目前是该公司的最大股东,拥有11%的已发行股份。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.5%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有4.3%的所有权。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前21名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of eBay

eBay 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that eBay Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$62m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,eBay Inc. 内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值6200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。在这种情况下,看看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出可能会更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司11%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - eBay has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例——eBay 有 1 个警告标志 我们认为你应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发