share_log

With 57% Institutional Ownership, Aurora Technology Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:ATAK) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 57% Institutional Ownership, Aurora Technology Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:ATAK) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

極光科技收購股份有限公司 (NASDAQ: ATAK) 擁有 57% 的機構所有權,是大槍支中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  2023/03/03 21:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Aurora Technology Acquisition implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在Aurora Technology收購中的大量持股意味着,它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前7名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 使用來自公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司未來的業績

If you want to know who really controls Aurora Technology Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:ATAK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着極光科技收購公司(納斯達克:ATAK),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的最大份額,擁有57%的股權。也就是説,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,該集團將損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得鉅額資金,它們的市場走勢往往會受到散户或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,擁有相當數量的機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視為一種可取的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Aurora Technology Acquisition.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Aurora Technology收購的不同所有權集團。

See our latest analysis for Aurora Technology Acquisition

查看我們對Aurora技術收購的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:ATAK Ownership Breakdown March 3rd 2023
NasdaqGM:ATAK所有權明細2023年3月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aurora Technology Acquisition?

關於Aurora技術收購,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

Aurora Technology Acquisition already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Aurora Technology Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Aurora Technology Acquisition已經在股票登記處擁有機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到極光科技收購的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:ATAK Earnings and Revenue Growth March 3rd 2023
NasdaqGM:ATAK收益和收入增長2023年3月3日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of Aurora Technology Acquisition. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. ATAC Sponsor LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. With 7.8% and 7.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hudson Bay Capital Management LP and Glazer Capital, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們的數據顯示,對衝基金擁有Aurora Technology收購交易16%的股份。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。ATAC贊助商LLC目前是該公司的最大股東,持有20%的流通股。Hudson Bay Capital Management LP和Glazer Capital,LLC分別持有7.8%和7.7%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查後,我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前7名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小股東平衡了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,所以它很可能在雷達下飛行。

Insider Ownership Of Aurora Technology Acquisition

奧羅拉技術收購的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據不能證實董事會成員是個人持股。董事會成員至少沒有一些個人持股是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。下一步很好的做法是檢查CEO的薪酬。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With 5.4% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, are a relatively smaller ownership class in Aurora Technology Acquisition. We'd generally expect to see a higher level of ownership by the general public, than this. It's not too concerning, but it is worth noting that retail investors might struggle to influence board decisions.

在極光科技收購中,普通公眾(主要由個人投資者組成)擁有5.4%的股權,是相對較小的所有權類別。我們通常預計,公眾的擁有率會比現在更高。這並不太令人擔憂,但值得注意的是,散户投資者可能很難影響董事會的決定。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 22%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司22%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Aurora Technology Acquisition you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現收購Aurora Technology的2個警告信號你應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。所以讓我們來看看這個免費 免費有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論