share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Fastenal Company's (NASDAQ:FAST) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Fastenal Company's (NASDAQ:FAST) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

在緊固件公司(NASDAQ:FAST)最新 4.1% 下降增加了一年損失之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴重步驟
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/20 20:40

Every investor in Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 79% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Fastenal公司(納斯達克代碼:FAST)的每個投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。持有79%股份的機構擁有該公司的最高股份。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$1.2b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 15% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Fastenal which might hurt individual investors.

其結果是,在市值縮水12億美元后,機構投資者上週遭受了最大損失。不用説,最近的虧損進一步增加了股東一年來15%的虧損,可能不會受到很好的歡迎,特別是對於這類股東。金融機構也被稱為“聰明的錢”,對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Fastenal,這可能會損害個人投資者的利益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fastenal, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究Fastenal的每種類型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Fastenal

查看我們對Fastenal的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FAST Ownership Breakdown January 20th 2023
NasdaqGS:快速所有權分解2023年1月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fastenal?

關於Fastenal,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

Fastenal already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fastenal's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Fastenal在股票登記處已經有機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Fastenal的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FAST Earnings and Revenue Growth January 20th 2023
納斯達克:快速盈利和收入增長2023年1月20日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Fastenal is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。Fastenal並不為對衝基金所有。我們的數據顯示,先鋒集團是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約7.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.9%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東總共控制着公司不到一半的股份,這意味着公司的股票被廣泛傳播,沒有佔主導地位的股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Fastenal

Fastenal的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our information suggests that Fastenal Company insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$49m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息顯示,Fastenal公司內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部人士會持有很大比例的股票。他們總共擁有4900萬美元的股票。至少看到一些內部人士持股總是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Fastenal. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Fastenal 21%的股份。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fastenal better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Fastenal , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解Fastenal,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了1個警告信號與Fastenal合作,瞭解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論