share_log

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chung Chun Lim Sees Holdings Value Fall by 11% Following Recent Drop

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chung Chun Lim Sees Holdings Value Fall by 11% Following Recent Drop

IFAST 株式会社's(SGX: AIY)最大股东、首席执行官钟春林预计,继最近下跌之后,控股的价值将下降11%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/17 06:45

A look at the shareholders of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 31% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看iFAST Corporation Ltd.(SGX:AIY)的股东就能知道哪个集团最有权势。而持有这块蛋糕最大份额的是拥有31%股权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

And following last week's 11% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌11%之后,内部人士遭受的损失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of iFAST, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下面的图表开始,更深入地研究iFAST的每种类型的所有者。

View our latest analysis for iFAST

查看我们对iFAST的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:AIY Ownership Breakdown January 16th 2023
新交所:AIY所有权明细2023年1月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?

关于iFAST,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in iFAST. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iFAST's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在iFAST拥有相当多的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到iFAST的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:AIY Earnings and Revenue Growth January 16th 2023
新交所:2023年1月16日AIY收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对冲基金在iFAST持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据可以看到,最大的股东是拥有20%流通股的首席执行官钟俊林。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有14%和13%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了让我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四大股东控制着公司一半以上的股份,这意味着这个群体对公司的决策有相当大的影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。相当多的分析师追踪这只股票,所以你可以很容易地研究预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of iFAST

IFAST的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$486m stake in this S$1.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息显示,内部人士持有iFAST Corporation Ltd.的大量股份。非常有趣的是,内部人士在这项16亿新元的业务中持有4.86亿新元的可观股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in iFAST. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,他们持有iFAST 30%的股份。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 15%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有15%的已发行股份。或许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,如内部人士,对这些私营公司中的一家有利害关系,则应在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with iFAST .

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该意识到2个警告标志我们已经发现了iFAST。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能会想一想这家公司是会增长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份显示分析师对其未来预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发